Antôn Sêkhốp tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Jahanzaib Raja _jahanzaib — I feel like the book was a bit incomplete, I mean one thing just jumps to another there's no time for it to actually sink in. I mean this is a book that I spend almost three days reading an I finished the novel in just an hour. A lot of scenes that I would have actually liked to see in the book, even simple sentences sometimes make a book, make you give an extra star, make you feel that it is different; so parts of a book are just essential and I think this book skipped a lot. And in some parts of the book I felt that the looks on the faces of characters at certain parts seemed off (of course, that could have been my imagination).

Max Zubtsov ziart — Notwithstanding the considerable quantity and quality of research within this book, it was a pleasure to find such a very readable text. Dr Brook’s book is a valuable addition to the bookshelf of anyone who loves, and has an interest in, the English language; because of the core importance of the linguistic contributions made by three (1549, 1552, and 1662) of the five editions of The Book of Common Prayer, in conjunction with the King James (‘Authorised’) Bible of 1611. For some while now, I’ve been of the opinion that the Second Collect in Evening Prayer sounds awkward, but I’d given up wondering why. Dr Brook helpfully explains (pg 135) that this clumsiness is due to “The appearance of anacoluthon, …” ‘Oh help,” I thought. “What on earth’s that?” I need not have become flustered (or reached for the e-dictionary on my Sony e-Reader); because the rest of Dr Brook’s sentence continues, “…or syntactic change of direction in the course of a sentence…” “Ah,” I thought, looking that Collect up in my 1928 (Eng.) Prayer Book; “I learn something new every day!” This book's like that.

Ofir Menachem ofirmenachem — Though the idea seemed interesting, the plot was just way too far-fetched, the writing simplistic and repetitive and the characters predictable. Other than the fact that the whole premise is an odd interpretation of a few chapters of the whole canon of scripture, there's little truth or doctrine - or even scriptural reference to found its claim. Fiction, yes but not well done.