Combo Bài Học Doanh Nhân (Bộ 5 Cuốn) - Tái Bản 2017 tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Gareth Edwards kaffienblog — Nice- I liked this one. A little too heavy handed with the metaphors (the maps, the life journey, what's beautiful etc.) Overall though, a nice story.

Olga Whale olgawhale — The book is so well written, you can not help but fall in love with the writting as well as the story

Alina Skyson alinaskyson — This book is preachy and makes some pretty absurd claims towards the end, but overall I found it to be a good read. I agree with Mr. Harris on a lot of points, but don't really feel his evidence would convince anyone to change their viewpoints.

Jonathan Hamot jonathanhad8bf — John Wesley Powell is an interesting person. And Wallace Stegner has a way with words (some of them made-up, as far as I can tell). His descriptions of Powell's running of the Colorado are wonderful. And Stegner's contention that Powell and this era had a profound impact on the western US seems well founded. And Stegner's observations in 1953 (when the book was published) as the US emerged from the Depression and WWII with building and development that dramatically changed the west are a lesson in themselves. BUT...this is not a "popular" history book and Stegner includes some distracting tangential information. Stegner seems to assume a knowledge of historical figures that have not crossed my path before. He includes a section on who named what physical features and who they were named after. He also has quite a dissertation on who drew/painted/photographed the Grand Canyon. Neither of these sections adds much to Powell's story. His using Gawain and the Round table as a metaphor for betrayal is fine. But to use Walter Murray Gibson as an example of an impostor leaves all but historians of the LDS Church or the Kingdom of Hawaii in the dark. I would have liked a bit more on Powell's personal life. His wife disappears from the story early (and I think pregnant)only to be mentioned again as Powell retires. But there is much "meat" here for thought about the federal government's role in science and its application to federal policies.