Không Đánh Mà Thắng - Chiến Lược Cạnh Tranh Lấy Nhỏ Thắng Lớn tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Longs Shen _ragonshen — ** spoiler alert ** I might go back and change my rating later on after I have had more time to digest everything better, but I doubt I will. I have some issues with this book and let me start by saying it's not a bad book. Actually, it's an interesting book and it's written pretty well. My issue was Hannah. I didn't like her tone on the tapes, the smugness of knowing she was revealing secrets and the reason I didn't like it is because she played her part on some of those secrets but she isn't around to deal with the consequences like everyone else would be if those tapes got released. Then to torture poor Clay like that and have him think he's on that tape because he did something wrong is just awful. Hannah didn't get a lot of sympathy from me because Hannah, while I agree she was treated like shit, made some really poor decisions as well. And when Clay tried to reach out to her, she pushed him away. Then she punishes everyone for not trying hard enough. I wanted to ask her, what else could they have done? If one person begged you not to kill yourself, would it have mattered? Would it have been enough when the next event happened? I don't think so. I believe she was going to do it no matter how hard Clay or Mr. Porter tried to stop her and to blame your suicide on people who tried to help you to the best of their capabilities is just wrong. I don't know... I just didn't like her. And that is why I could only give it three stars, her voice kept me from loving this book. She should have stopped the rape, acted sooner about the stop sign, etc. But she didn't and now they have to live with it while she took the other way out and it's not her problem anymore. I just don't know how I feel about that.

Alcir Junior alcirjunior3d — This is the second book I’ve read by Gaston Leroux, the first being The Phantom of the Opera. What recommends Leroux most is his unique style. He was a journalist before becoming an author and he writes his books in the style of a turn of the century press release. There is very little moralizing and few philosophical asides. Instead he mainly sticks to the facts. My issue with this story is that I found it uninteresting. I really didn’t care to try to figure out the mystery, or find out who the perpetrator was. The only character I found interesting was the victim and she was not given much action in the novel, other than screaming. Outdated notions of propriety caused most of the roadblocks in discovering the identity of the attacker. The writing was very clumsy at times. An example: “I was interested only in the health of Mademoiselle Strangerson, which was daily improving, when something occurred that is even more mysterious than – than the mystery of The Yellow Room! ‘Impossible!’ I cried, ‘What could be more mysterious than that?’” I’m not sure if an exchange like that was supposed to be humorous, but I found it very funny and ridiculous. As a teenager I went through an extended Sherlock Holmes/ Herucle Poriet phase. This novel had the most similarity with Sherlock Holmes. It had a similar crime-solving genius/ confused friend dynamic going on between the two main characters. Similar to Sherlock Holmes, the novel is told from the point of view of the unenlightened friend, who is only given occasional clues as to what his more intelligent companion is thinking. This serves as a handy plot device because it keeps the reader in the dark on many important points until the author sees fit to reveal them. However, Holmes and Watson are infinitely more charismatic characters than the main characters of this novel. It seems unfair to compare Leroux with Arthur Conan Doyle, who is one of the great geniuses of mystery writing, but with all the similarities I found it impossible not to. Perhaps if I had read this novel first, I would have been more impressed. “Logic will upset you if you use it indiscriminately.” P.58