Kỹ Thuật Trị Các Bệnh Của Gà tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Edu Pastor epastordua0d0b — I really enjoyed this book. It definitely made me think a lot. I could probably write a paper about it. The basic idea of the book is how conservative politicians will manipulate science or lie about science or create false science to fit in their political goals. For me the most fascinating parts of it were the reasons why conservatives/republicans would make up fake science. For a lot of the issues, it was "big industry" that would fight a claim. Examples include issues like Climate Change and the Ozone Hole. So, these big companies have a lot to lose if it turns out their product has these negative impacts -- so they invest money in fake science to fight it. Interesting, sure. But to me, the more interesting issues are those where there is no "big industry" perpetuating the false science. So these issues include things like abortion, birth control, intelligent design, condom effectiveness, the morning after pill, etc. The people/politicians making up fake science to fight or create these issues are doing so just because of their personal moral beliefs. So I wonder where the money comes from. I also, in my head, was trying to figure out which is worse: lying about something for the sake of money or for the sake of your personal belief system? As Dylan pointed out to me, it's still lying regardless of your purpose. So yeah, this book just made me think a lot about society and how morality can affect it. I'm just left wondering what the purpose is of those who fight to have Intelligent Design taught in schools or those who fight abortion by making up some study about its detrimental effects. Probably as soon as you saw the issues listed, you knew it was a conservative Christian issue. So, what's in it for them? In conclusion (although I could say more), I do see the reason why you need more than just scientific evidence in order to make decisions. You need to consider things like "just because we can, should we?" I think that both science and personal religious beliefs can exist inside a person's own mind. But the line should be drawn somewhere before you start making up science to match your religious/conservative/moral beliefs. And end.