Mọi Chuyện Đều Là Lỗi Của Em tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Jean-robert Saintil _saintil — Speaker for the Dead is not just a brilliant story, but also a profound experience, a spiritual and emotional journey that simply leaves one breathless. Speaker is a richly complex story that focuses on many facets, from the societal culture of Lucitania, the relationships of the Ribeira family, the Pequeninos, Ender's past, Jane, the hundred worlds, and the Speaking itself. The story maintains a smooth, kinetic liquidity that just washes over you and absorbs you. Speaker for the Dead is a vastly different novel than "Ender's Game," and those looking for more of the same should instead continue on to "Ender's Shadow," and the subsequent novels centered around Bean. Speaker is a much deeper book, it is a story without the heart-pounding adrenaline rush of its predecessor, but one that is infinitely more moving and beautiful. It should come as no surprise that Speaker for the Dead was the novel that Orson Scott Card really wanted to write, and that Ender's Game was written merely as a backstory. Ender's Game is the story of Andrew Wiggin's childhood; Speaker for the Dead is where he grows up.

Lisimaco Medina lisimaco — This is very well done...thirteen characters in Maine revolve around Olive and it is quite intriquing. I had read the author's other book Amy and Isabelle and I think tis is a much better book. I recommend it. It will keep your interest and is a slice of life in rural Maine. Olive herself is not particularly a likable woman but by the end you do care for her. Good summer read.

Erika Hiebert erikahiebert — if ur a husker fan read this

Sara Palaio sarapalaio — Being thin and tall, this story really hit hard.

Cindy Jiang 0w0 — "It is said that the personal is political. That is not true, of course. At the core of the fight for political rights is the desire to protect ourselves, to prevent the political from intruding on our personal lives. Personal and political are interdependent but not one and the same thing.... The realm of imagination is a bridge between them, constantly refashioning one in terms of the other." Nafisi's memoir covers a lot of ground (way more than the promotional blurbs would suggest) in relating her experiences living in Iran under fundamentalist Islamic rule, as a woman, and as an academic, and specifically as a scholar of Western literature. She does not tell an especially coherent, linear narrative: she wanders, and she knows it, and she can't help it. She needs so badly to be true to her experience, and neat little narrative lines feel insincere to her. So she superimposes a structure by correlating themes in her life with critical observations about books important to her (Lolita, The Great Gatsby, Henry James, and Jane Austen). It works, but it worked for me especially well in the first two sections of the book ("Lolita" and "Gatsby") because I'd actually read the books she was discussing. Her observations on both literature and fundamentalist revolution are potent, and she expresses them with passion.