Nếu Anh Muốn Quay Lại, Em Có Đồng Ý Không? tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

David Valencia dogor_54a3 — I read this because of its ratings here and on amazon and blogs, and I have to say, what a surprise. This isn't my usual book, or so I thought. But it turns out I don't have a usual book, just those that keep me turning the pages, excited and involved. What's going to happen next? How did this writer learn all this stuff? How long did she have to research? Has anyone read the selected bibliography at the back of the book? Damn. I am so impressed. And then to read what she's made of all those books. Cutting through all the complexities so-called scholars make of things, ignoring those who take everything literally, soaring into realms of brilliant idea. Okay, I'm might be going on a little here, but this was some book. Someone here said it read like "some teenager" wrote it. Are they kidding? I'd like to meet that teenager. Teenagers can barely talk, much less conceive of the ideas presented in this book. As for the story, it's a mindblower. Taking that old Biblical mess, four gospels, four different stories, and coming up with one coherent heart-wrenching tale of people on the spiritual edge in the middle of a world gone mad with ideology and Roman domination. Shades of what is happening right now in the very same spot on earth. What's with the so-called Holy Land? It produces such crazed ugliness and then, once in a while, the sublime. I think this book is sublime.

Michell Montilla mfmontilla5c61 — Pan-doron: dono di tutti (gli dei) Pro-meteo: colui che sa Prima (il Lungimirante, che possiese la Metis: astuzia) colui che gioca gli dei, ossa ricoperte di grasso... Epi-meteo: colui che sa Dopo... il disastro fatto. Esiodo e la Theogonia. Testo immenso. Qui lo si legge come se si fosse su di una macchina lanciata a grande velocità: non si vede nulla del panorama. Peccato. Belle però le illustrazioni.

Cynthia Young cynyoung31 — I'd never read an Agatha Christie novel before and didn't know what to expect. Reading this I felt like I was watching a murder mystery dinner. I appreciated the straightforward crime and the frank and logical way of finding the solution. Some of Poirot's conclusions (which were always correct) seemed a bit of a long-shot for a guess, but I suppose that's part of what adds to the delight of down-to-earth mystery novels. The reader could follow the mystery well, and aside from the impossibly correct guesses Poirot makes, the reader can feel comfortable making her own guesses about the case. I suspected the ending and was pleasantly surprised at the outcome. This is a solid and straightforward mystery that doesn't manipulate or deceive. I think I'll go back to Christie for a refreshing read now and again.