Phật Giáo Có Là Tôn Giáo Không? tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Javier Castro javiercastroj — Classic Binchy, though a few of the characters were not as well developed as they could have been (I found myself asking, "Who was that again?" and "How do they relate to the others?" even toward the back sections of the book.)

Giuliana Rebagliati giulianarebagliati — ** spoiler alert ** This book was very funny. I really liked the story telling. Everyone says that the ending is sad, however, I disagree. Marley lived a full life, and it was time for him to die.

Ruan Oscar _scar_uan — Paul de Man is a master at literary analysis. Next to Derrida, he is the great intellectual figure of 1960s deconstructionism (part of "the Yale School"). However, unlike Derrida, his writing is accessible and unambiguous. Too many people dismiss deconstructive analysis for all the wrong reasons (wrong reasons being its association with a whole Derridean school of obscurantism - A. Ronell, G. Spivak, J. Butler, S. Weber, etc. etc.) Paul de Man, however, makes committments to clear writing and achieves the same desired effect as that of the more frustrating thinkers. The essay, "Semiology and Rhetoric", is absolutely crucial for any student of literary theory. It contains the famous, humorous "Archie Bunker example" that so aptly illustrates the inherent tensions of grammar & rhetoric - tensions that make the indeterminancy of meaning unavoidable. The essays on Nietzsche are some of the best and most original I've ever read. He writes an essay covering my favorite piece of Nietzsche's writing: "On Truth and Lying in a Non-Moral Sense." His work on Rousseau is very valuable & informative as well. De Man sets the example of a careful, erudite reader, and few can follow in his footsteps - however, all may appreciate the depth of his thought due to the clarity of his writing.