Survivor tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Victoria Verner vernervictorija — "It sounds like Henry James called everyone beautiful and marvellous," said Sam, a little sourly, "from what you say." Oh, beautiful, magnificent... wonderful. I supposed it's really more what the characters calls each other, especially when they're being wicked. in the later books, you know, they do it more and more, when actually, they're more and more ugly -- in a moral sense." "Right..."; said Simon. "The worse they are the more they see beauty in each other." "Interesting," said Howard drily. Nick cast a fond glance at his little audience. 'There's a marvellous bit in his play 'The high bid,' when a man says to the butler in a country house, 'I mean, to whom do you beautifully b e l o n g?" [...] So he prattled on, mixing up sex and scholarship, and enjoying his wanderings away from the strict truth. In fact, that was really the fun of it. And it seemed to fit in with the air of fantasy in the Ogee office, the distant sense of an avoided issue." (183) Lurid and perfect... and i'm only about 2/3s through :) 2011: it's a midwestern tradition to read this book, practically. The bar scene where he recognizes Leo is perfect -- as sad as Wharton and careful as HJ.

Laura Ayala solomuerecac3 — Why Marx Was Right by Terry Eagleton seems to me to be a good candidate for required reading for all high school students-as well as people my age looking for a good introduction to Marx. It doesn't hurt to be a little left of center but it's not a prereq. Well-written, well-reasoned, the book is a welcome introduction to an important figure by an excellent writer. Eagleton is not rabid on his subject and is able to see flaws in his subject. And while this book won't tell someone all they need to know about Marxism (could any one book?), I found it accessible and interesting (always a great combination of traits in a non-fiction book on a dense subject. I personally think everyone should read it. And I would welcome any suggestions for other accessible books on the topic, not necessarily "pro" but not impassioned "anti" either.