Thấu Hiểu Và Hỗ Trợ Trẻ Tự Kỷ tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Guillermo Garcia kbushi — As I'm a layperson on the subject matter, (psychology, not Evil- though I hope never to be more than an occasional amateur in that) I'm not able to adequately comment on the scientific or clinical aspects of this topic. My most critical negative comment, however, is that this was what is precisely lacking here. The title presents the subject matter as 'Science of...' but the content was superficial. I appreciated the author's many assertions, and his theory, but I would have liked to see more evidence. I recall that he only cited one original clinical study, and there wasn't enough hard evidence. More investigation is needed, and should be cited. This is not a book for the practitioner. Those caveats behind me I can now go on to my other critical feedback. I largely agree with the framework the author presented for the basis of Evil being the lack of Empathy, in humans, and I believe that Evil is a human construct. I am an atheist who believed that Evil was in some way ignorance, a misdirection that could be carefully remedied through compassionate, persistent care by others. Evil, for me was a ghost, until like millions of others I witnessed the atrocities of the late 20th century. I remain an atheist, but I believe in Evil now, and this is what attracted me to this book. Was there a way to reconcile my ethical judgements and resentments of the actions of many fellow human beings with my humanistic perspective? Was there a solution here for one such as myself, adrift in the universe with only my firm belief in the scientific method to guide me? Perhaps there is, but I want to see more clinical investigation to support this author's theory, this book is a start, and I hope we will see more in a future edition. I genuinely hope he will pursue his interest in this subject and will share his findings. I would like to see some peer reviewed science that is funded by scientific bodies without a biased point of view. There was a lot of social commentary here, and there was a lot of opinion that could have been presented as an appendix. 3 stars, I enjoyed it, but it was television when I wanted a carefully planned and executed documentary.