Tủ Sách Vàng Cho Con - Truyện Cổ Grimm tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Jayvee Mariano brushworx — prepare to be horribly depressed. this was a consciousness raising novel written in the 1960s, i think.... in other words, it tells the story of a group of women who are "friends" who all live in the same suburban community in the late 50s and early 60s. they all have depressing and repressed lives... there is the catholic woman with 17 children who is becoming an alcoholic, there is the woman with the frigid husband, the woman with the unfaithful husband, etc. the book's point was to open eyes to the deeply unhappy lives behind a happy facade before and after the women's lib movement. thouroughly depressing, but very thought provoking. i gave it three stars instead of four because it never gave men a chance to speak for themselves but portrayed them only as oppressors, which might have been necessary given the time period...

Findara Mcavinchey finnmcavinb695 — The dead have no secrets in this book. Masters captures in just a few lines each person's identity. What they say and how they say it is the minimalist characterization for each name in succession. Verses not written in rhyme, just giving a brief glimpse of insight into each corpses thoughts. The ways that the deceased townsfolk are interconnected are often surprising-clashes emphasized by the fact that they all end up buried right next to their neighbors in life. Brilliant!

Eduardo Nuzzi edunuzzi — You know a book is good when you're sad because you've finished it. This book reminded me a lot of "A Tree Grows In Brooklyn" as it's told from the eyes of a young girl and follows the Starkey family (as well as neighboring families) through 1920's Kansas. It was hard to put this book down (even at 1 a.m) and I found myself hoping there would be a sequel book someday.

Luiz Ortega luizngust61e0 — it took a long time to get into it, but then it got good.

Waichiku Azusa yuka2494957d — I read this book in one afternoon, which is to say it was gripping. But after finishing it, I realize it was not as "deep" or philosophical as I was expecting; almost a bit too teeny-bopper for me.