Bin Li từ Sainte-Marguerite-Lafigère, France

_obinw

12/22/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Bin Li Sách lại (10)

2020-01-18 22:30

Kỹ Thuật Trồng & Uốn Tỉa Bonsai Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

An amazing gift given to me by a close friend, however it slipped my grasp and was not returned yet :(

2020-01-18 23:30

Mỗi Đêm Một Câu Chuyện Kinh Dị Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Amazingly powerful, I couldn't put it down. Set in a apocalyptic future, the disaster isn't spelled out, but seems to be post-nuclear war. A father and son (unnamed) are traveling "the road". Somehow, it all rings eerily true.

2020-01-19 00:30

Từ Điển Thành Ngữ & Tục Ngữ Việt Nam Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: GS. Nguyễn Lân

this was my second favorite in the twilight saga. i liked the action at the end, and that everything ended pretty happy

2020-01-19 01:30

Giáo Trình Microsoft Excel 2003 Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Dân Trí

I think I have a little crush on Jack Gilbert.

2020-01-19 02:30

Thiền Định (Sách Tô Màu Dành Cho Mọi Lứa Tuổi) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Arcturus

The ending made me quite melancholy. It was really a quite striking play. Manus, Yolland, Maire, Sally. They're all such tragic characters. What happened to George?

2020-01-19 03:30

Nobita Và Truyền Thuyết Vua Mặt Trời - Tập 1 Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Yeah, try: HATED IT. More like Mists of Crapalon. Leave Wart alone!

2020-01-19 04:30

Liệu Pháp Xoa Vuốt Kinh Lạc Ở Trẻ Em Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Too cute!

2020-01-19 05:30

Combo Lối Sống Tối Giản (Trọn Bộ 3 Cuốn) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Bk 2

2020-01-19 06:30

Giải Bài Tập Tiếng Anh Lớp 8 - Tập 2 Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: The Windy

I just finished the book this weekend. Although I don't like his derisive approach, and feel that he should have put the last chapters first (and done away with some of the opening pages), I have to say that I agree with his basic points. Where does this put me? In an interesting place to tell you the truth. At the same time, I have to admit, following through with atheistic thought is much more comforting than I would have imagined. It gives responsibility back to me in a strange way, although Dawkins biologic determinism bothers me just like Calvinist determinism bothers me. Strange that it should be there on both sides. Nevertheless, atheistic thought makes the every day even more precious. "Is this all there is? Becomes THIS is all there is, therefore make the most of it." It makes each person I love more precious, because time is short and I want every moment to be full of significance for NOW because all we have is now. I did away with Christian soteriology a long time ago. As a result, the whole scaffolding for Christianity fell away and there was not much left except some moral teaching. The only things I will hold on to (and don't we all hold on to some magical thinking) are those things that I cannot explain: my dreams (which, to my mind, have some significance beyond the brain cleaning itself out); my intuition (that has never seemed unusual to me but startles most people when they come in contact with it); my imagination (that startles me all the time!); my love for the fanciful and fantastic. ******* I'm not finished yet. In the first 100 pages, Dawkins began with such derision and "straw man" arguments, that I was frustrated. I laughed out loud that he had to limit the definition of God to "supernatural." What if God isn't supernatural? And of course, he admits that a "pantheistic" God is acceptable yet still undefinable except as a metaphor. I was amused, too, that he hates the "metaphorical god" vocabulary that Hawking and Einstein used. (Except for the fundamentalists, most people's concept of God is quite pantheistic. That is where religion is going and has been since the Transcendentalists. Karen Anderson would probably argue that it goes back further than that.The Feminist Spirituality movement would claim that that it goes all the way back to the "pre-patriarchal" time,and that the "patriarchal religion blip," though it has caused much chaos and suffering, is going away. Of course the Feminists are all over the "political" background of monotheistic religions. I am of the opinion that it wouldn't take science to persuade "fundamentalists" of their delusion. I think it has to do more with the political/historical/anthropological/psychological aspects to persuade them. It also has to do with using their vocabulary. Perhaps he gets to this later in the book. I wish Dawkins were in further conversation with psychologists about some of his assertions. I feel conversations with some of the more recent developments/ideas in psychology as it has to do with what some call "spiritual emergency" and others merely call "psychotic break" would help his cause and give him a more sophisticated vocabulary with which to work. But after 100 pages, Dawkins seems to finally gotten down to business with less vitriol and embarrassing comments (such as his comment about "if we are gullible, we don't recognize hallucinations or lucid dreaming for what it is, . . . . especially if we are young, female, and Catholic.") and more substance and intelligence. He finally brings into his the work of theologians that is scholarly. He is acknowledging the roles of anthropology, sociology, and psychology.

2020-01-19 07:30

Trong Tầm Ngắm Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Clare Mackintosh

all the characters in this book are stupid...

Người đọc Bin Li từ Sainte-Marguerite-Lafigère, France

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.