Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Tạ Ngọc Ái
I've been trying to find a used copy of this Oxford reader since around 2001, with no luck. Very good collection of papers on perception, with material on disjunctivism and causal theories--classic Oxford stuff from the late 70s, early 80s.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Georgina Segarra
I'm glad Marianne chose this book because there is a lot to discuss. I hope that I am not just discussing it with myself since many of our book club either haven't finished it or didn't like it much. I have heard The Heart is a Lonely Hunter is similar to To Kill a Mockingbird. The books are only alike in that they were both written by a fairly young woman in the Southern Gothic style and take place in the south. The Heart is a Lonely Hunter left me hopeless, while To Kill a Mockingbird left me hopeful. The Heart is a Lonely Hunter left me with a fatalistic hopeless feeling even in the most positive character, Mick. She had so much potential musically, but from the very beginning of the story when she failed to make a homemade violin, I felt heartbroken for her. She craved music and was so moved by it, but she knew that her position in life would never allow her the opportunity to study it. The other four main characters were self-destructive and written grotesquely. All were lonely independent characters only concerned with themselves. While they were aware of each others existence, they were mostly unaware of the parts they played in each others lives. A biography of Carson McCullers said the book is written like a fugue in 3 parts. McCullers was sent to study piano at Julliard as a teen, but lost the money for her tuition before she got there so she decided to become a writer.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Trần Hy
C.S. Lewis at his weirdest, and best. Update for one person, and one person alone: this book was named by David Foster Wallace as the greatest novel of all time. So...you might want to read it.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Mike Moreno
I read all her books. She is a RWA(Romance Writers of America)five time winner. Some of my personal favorites are part of her Chicago Stars series; see "It Had To Be You".
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nguyễn Ngọc Sơn
Started this book right before I took off for a long journey, which in retrospect, was not a wise decision. Marquez deserves your attention and mine I did not give. Will pick this up again someday when I'm settled and have curbed my reading ADD.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Anh Đào
Kurt Vonnegut broke his promise to never write another book when he came out with this collection of mini-memoirs. I read it in two hours this morning and it was like sharing my Sunday morning coffee with an old and wise friend. Kurt is funny, compassionate, humanist. As an atheist he praises Jesus asking the question, if what he taught was so beautiful, then why does it matter if he was god? He lampoons the Bush and co as PP's, psychopathic personalities, devoid of passion who have made America as hated and feared the world over as the Nazi's once were. But this is not a political book, it is not an academic, or an intellectual book, thank god. This is a truthful book from an old man tired of pretension. He will tell you when he kids, he will tell you when he is serious. Kurt Vonnegut is gone now, but if you want him to feel alive again, then read this book.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: White
There was hippocrates/Galen, astrology, Jung and a number of other personality theorists, then came the enneagram
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều Tác Giả
adventure,humor,romance and swordfights. I have never been particularly fond of Dartagnan, but can't get enough of Athos.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Vương Nghệ Lộ
Pity this will not be a movie anytime soon- the demonstrations and reactions- and hopefully the resulting dialogs- would be intense
Great initial premise, acceptable execution, sloppy and overly self-conscious finish. When Paul Auster is on, he's an excellent writer with a knack for description. It just takes more to make a novelist. Sure, he raises some questions about the Nature of Fiction and of Language, but he never follows through with them, so who cares? His characters start off believable people but by halfway through they lose all semblance of humanity. As a post-modern exercise, the book might succeed if it could stop being so smug. As a novel, it fails; as a representation of thinking feeling humans in their encounter with their worlds, it manages to fall *below* the works of Terry Goodkind - and when your work is less human than a book that contains an ancient Objectivist wizard named Zeddicus Zu'ul Zorander, you know you're in trouble. Read it for the atmosphere, which is at its best an acceptable echo of Tom Waits' Night Hawks at the Diner, and keeps you turning the pages long after logic quits. I've got the other two volumes of the New York Trilogy in an omnibus; I'll keep reading and see what I find. So far I'm midway through Ghosts, and prospects ain't good.
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.