Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Laurie Faria Stolarz
Fluffy early book by Janet Evanovich. This one even had a teensy bit of a mystery to it. It was cute and funny and I enjoyed it.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
A decent and engrossing read, but nothing amazing here.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều Tác Giả
A hilarious and human account of a unique up-bringing set in a very liberal time and place.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Mai Lan Hương & Nguyễn Thanh Loan
Very sad to think this could really happen to a child and he lived to tell about it. I would give it 5 stars but it is depressing to read!
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nam Cao
جالبه، اونقدی که من 2 نسخه ازش دارم
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều tác giả
buku yang bagus..mencerahkan..
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nguyễn Thụy Anh
This first instalment of the Canadian Magic Tree House introduces our two protagonists Emily and Matt to us, as well as to each other. They also discover a magical red sled (the Red Flyer of the series title) in the tower room of Emilie's new house. It transports them to the deck of Martin Frobisher's ship The Aid in 1577. As I mentioned, this series is the Canadian Magic Tree House. It is an early chapter book that is short enough (66 pages of story) and has simple enough language to appeal to the young reader. It also is an nice entry point for discussion on how the Europeans treated the Aboriginals. Cute book, almost too Canadian in its earnestness to be politically correct.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Angela Marsons
Mansfield Park is the second Jane Austen book I have read (Emma the other) so I don’t pretend to be an expert on her. And I am not even familiar with the other stories that much. (keep in mind I am a boy so I was not raised on Austen) I have mixed feelings about Mansfield Park. There were things I liked a lot and other things I found disagreeable. I mostly liked Fanny. I think I liked her more than Emma. But I know Austen’s intent was to create Emma to unlikeable. I had Cinderella’s sympathy for Fanny, being bossed by cousins and aunts. But I also see her partly to blame for her circumstance, she is too timid too often. But maybe I am not remembering how little power a female had at the time. The book muddled down for me in the play section. First trying to decide on a play, then arguing over its production. Ugg. I realize it was the chunk of the book where the characters were flushed out and their interactions unfolded, but really it was a dull stretch. I am not sure if I bought the actions of the sisters Bertram. They seem so insistent on being proper and seem to pressure Fanny into acting “appropriately” but then they both run off at the end and act so inappropriate. Mary Crawford was very enigmatic too. I never quite knew if she was sincere in all her well wishing or if it was an act. At times she seemed fake, but there is no indication from Austen that she was anything but sincere. Maybe the lens of 2011 has jaded me from believing in Ms. Crawford. And I don’t know how to take Fanny and Edmund ending together. It seems to be the theme of Austen that love is often right under our noses if we are willing to re-evaluate our lives. Is Fanny just a rebound relationship for Edmund? At what point does your first cousin, raised like a sibling, become creepy? I was struck by the contrast of Austen’s treatment of the poor and Dickens. Dickens writes roughly 25 years later and seems to uplift the poor and want to show those better off that the poor are people too and should be treated as such. In Fanny’s episode in Portsmouth, the poverty of her family (which is far from true poverty) is seen as an obstacle and a shameful mark. It would seem that Fanny might have even changed her mind and her moral conviction about Henry Crawford just to be rescued from her plight in Portsmouth had enough time passed and had the shit not all hit the fan. I don’t mean to be overly harsh on Austen. She is telling a story and to understand the haves, the poor must be seen through their eyes. For all I know Austen could have done much in her life to assist the needy. I’ll continue to read Austen through my long rotation of authors. Torn on my rating, 2 1/2 stars is what I want to give it, but will settle for 3.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Sói Xám Mọc Cánh
3.5
I think this book gave me more mixed feelings than any other book I've read in the past five years. On one hand, I'd like to give the book one star; on the other hand, it could also be a four star book. The string of character is bit confusing at first, then I started to get very attached to them. That's when the book became disappointing. Not because I genuinely liked some of the characters, but because she felt the need to turn it into a history book just as the story is getting good. This happens off and on for the last 2/3rds of the book. More on than off for the last third. It's sad because this book really had some great potential. At some points, it feels like some kind arts and literary of name dropping game. Then it goes into great detail as to how WWI developed. At the very end it goes a bit back to the characters. I think I'd be furious enough to burn the book if it didn't! All in all, it was a huge waste of time. I should've just skipped all of the history sections, but I was afraid it'd be critical to the story line. (It's not. Brush up a little on your WWI history, particularly European and you'll be fine.) I truly wanted to like this book but in the end, I was really let down. Again, though; I feel the need to note: it's an excellent book if you take out all but the most basic of history.
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.