Stefany Rodden từ Spalding SA , Australia

_tefrodden

05/02/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Stefany Rodden Sách lại (10)

2018-10-31 17:30

44 Gương Hiếu Thảo Hiếu Học Xưa Và Nay Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

I love Donalyn Miller. Her blog is absolutely fantastic. I really love her approach to teaching "language arts"--to me, it seems completely common sense. Clearly what we're doing now isn't working; the whole worksheet/book report/booklog thing is spiritually/intellectually killing all kids, whether they're the strongest or weakest readers. So her philosophy makes sense (and obviously works). H o w e v e r, I have to say I was a tiny bit disappointed in this book by itself. It's more a sustained argument for her approach, which may be perfect for people who are not sure about her philosophy. For those who are totally excited by her philosophy...the book doesn't really give me a good grasp of what her day in the classroom looks like, and that's what I was dying to see. A brief glance at the book makes it sound like her kids spend every minute of every day just reading, but that's clearly not the case, especially since she has a block schedule. She makes occasional references to the things she does with her class (defining genres, for example, or individual meetings, or the kids presenting book commercials) but never spells out what percentage of the day and/or week she spends on actual activities like those and what percentage her kids spend reading. I just wanted to get an idea of how she shapes her day, and what kind of analytical tools she teaches, and so on. So the book was a little less immediately useful than I was hoping for.

2018-10-31 19:30

Bob - Chú Mèo Đường Phố Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: James Bowen

Down the ride to the very end it's "Me and My Boy Friend". When I got to the end I fell way off. Reviewing the book I found that it included what people want to read but did it poorly. Even with these elements the characters came across as fake. The story surrounded it's self in the same place over and over again. The worst thing I noticed was the way relationships were forced into the scene. Any way, unless its Bonnie and Clyde who wants to hear about any one else relationship? This book was in the ghetto the whole time. It wasn’t adventurous at all. I didn’t enjoy the fact that the people in this book didn’t go places and was involved with the same surroundings over and over again. I like books that take places in more than one setting and explore different places. That’s the reason that on the other than d I like the author, Sister Souljah. The author seemed as if she or he had no personal life and didn’t understand how people are suppose to act. I didn’t understand the friend ships and the family relationships. I usually enjoy books that show a variety of relationships between people and not just one. I wanted to see about the girls in the hood and for the author to describe how it really is. Everyone was so fake. That’s the type of people I hate. It seemed like a lack of time to put the book together and shape and form characters. The girl- can’t even remember the name- was boring and it seemed as if it took no imagination at all. I think I could have written something better than that and planned out a character base at a better level. This book felled horribly to me. I was forced to give it 1 star. It disserved nothing better. I think this book was written without self-experience. To write for someone else to see you have to had gone through is in some shape way or room in your life. "Me and My Boy Friend" was a boring book because it didn’t have my important elements.

Người đọc Stefany Rodden từ Spalding SA , Australia

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.