Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
I love this book because the illustration make the character alive and also the characters in this book so handsome it make me wants to read again and again.not only for that it contain moral value such as loving, friendship and caring with each other. It also contain spell to destroy their enemy. It shown how the person can feel other pain which is Yuuki the main character in this story. He hope the he have he can protec for people he love.I hope everyone who has not read this book must read this book and enjoy it :)
Not your average fantasy read - a great amalgam of witches, vampires, daemons, science and history. Looking forward to the next step in this story.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Ngô Tường Mẫn
So I finished the book and aside from a few issues (like the end dragging a bit) I liked it. I even ended up doing some Mughal India research on the side, b/c it was so interesting. Good pick Roohe!
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Dương Mạnh Hùng
I'd probably really give this a 3 1/2. I really debated between 3 and 4. I really enjoyed it; loved the story and characters, especially Katherine, and was, once again, fascinated by British history. However, it was VERY long and took a VERY long time to read. I could only get through about 30 pages an hour. But, that being said, it was definitely worth the read. I didn't guess the ending and was very satisfied with it. I liked how love and forgiveness came full circle.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Kim Lân
Very entertaining book of short stories. Perfect for the single gal.
His early years in Hawaii and Indonesia, and later is time as a community organizer in Chicago was amazing. His trip to Africa, the last 1/3 of the book bored me to tears.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phi Yên
I feel a bit pretentious putting this book on as my first review, but I've read it twice in the last two years (once independently and then for my book club), so I figured I'd put it on. This is a really good book. One of the things thats nice is that it's very hard to pigeonhole. It's not just an environmentalist screed, nor is it a practical survival manual or a scientific journal of nature; at any given moment it can appear to be any of these things, but it never stays there long. It's alternately whimsical musing, but can switch quite quickly to earnest exhortation or what some may consider to be downright self righteous preaching. One member of my book club felt Thoreau could be chiefly characterized as a "pompous ass" for which opinion the book provides plenty of support, but he also had plenty of self deprecating anecdotes and observations that I felt took the edge off of his pompousness. The book is often framed in terms of what Thoreau's against. Claims are made that his main purpose is to oppose capitalism, consumerism, modern life and to generally paint him as a devout leftist, but again I think efforts to pigeonhole his philosophy and make it fit neatly into the modern American political spectrum are foolish and useless endeavors. Certainly his essay "Civil Disobedience", which was also contained in my copy of Walden, comes across as a libertarian anti-government lecture. In the end I think Walden is more than anything an attempt at an honest collection of thoughts. Thoreau's philosophy doesn't come across as wholly focused or consistent. One good example is the chapter "Reading", where he extols the virtues of communing with the great minds which have gone before and of immersing yourself in great literature, but in the opening of the very next chapter "Sounds" he says: "But while we are confined to books, though the most select and classic, and read only particular written languages, which are themselves but dialects and provincial, we are in danger of forgetting the language which all things and events speak without metaphor, which alone is copious and standard. Much is published, but little printed. The rays which stream through the shutter will no longer be remembered when the shutter is wholly removed. No method nor discipline can supersede the necessity of being for ever on the alert. What is a course of history, or philosophy, or poetry, no matter how well selected, or the best society, or the most admirable routine of life, compared with the discipline of looking always at what is to be seen. Will you be a reader, a student merely, or a seer?" Thoreau strikes me as a man who thinks deeply on many subjects and thus often finds himself having a thought that contradicts a previous one. He doesn't immediately reject the thought because it would shake his world view, but lets it play in his mind rambling about with the ones he'd had before. I think the book's main point, as summed up in the final chapter, is to encourage us to think deeply. One of the main arguments that Thoreau is anti-capitalist comes from this paragraph in Chapter 1 "Economy": "Shall we forever resign the pleasure of construction to the carpenter? What does architecture amount to in the experience of the mass of men? I never in all my walks came across a man engaged in so simple and natural an occupation as building his house. We belong to the community. It is not the tailor alone who is the ninth part of a man; it is as much the preacher, and the merchant, and the farmer. Where is this division of labor to end and what object does it finally serve? No doubt another may also think for me; but it is not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my thinking for myself." Certainly an attack on the division of labor is an attack at the core of our modern economic systems, but it's also a criticism to consider. Have we allowed a small percentage of the population become our designated thinkers and readers? Is all of modern society's intellectualism to be contained in ivory towers built solely for that purpose? Where is the man who can build his own home, grow his own beans and quote the great philosophers with proficiency, and can we afford to lose such men? Anyway it's a great thought provoking book. I gave it four stars, because I was sometimes bored, but maybe that's more a failing of mine than it is the book's. I'd recommend that anyone read it.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Trần Kim Trắc
I was surprised by how "un-scary" this book was. It was certainly a fast read because King writes it in a conversational tone and it's marginally satisfying to hear about his life as a famous (rich) novelist. I was actually inspired to write for a little while when I first read it. (Nevermind the fact that I was reading it for a Creative Writing class and I had to write assignments!) In the end, King resorts to a pretty predictable message: the more practice you get, the better writer you become. Some people might like this book because King discusses other writers and their books.
***1/2 Stephen King gets a decent amount of criticism for being wordy, and I almost never agree. His two longest books, IT and The Stand, are two of his best, actually. But in the case of The Tommyknockers, the criticism may be warranted. A very good book at 747 pages (paperback) that would have been much better at about 550. There are some really great moments in this story-- particularly those between the two main characters, Bobbi and Gard, as the reader watches their relationship change and decay and then look back on itself--and there are a number of tense, exciting scenes, but overall it just goes on a bit long.
YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT THE NEXT PERSON IS GOING THROUGH. NEVER CLOSE YOUR HEARTS TO SOMEONE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT KIND OF FRIEND YOU WILL HAVE. HE IS A REMARKABLE WRITER AND HE IS LIVING THE DREAM I WOULD ONDAY LOVE TO ACCOMPLISH.
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.