Diane Gallardo từ Yiğitler/Diyarbakır, Turkey

whitemofo010

05/04/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Diane Gallardo Sách lại (10)

2019-03-26 00:31

Đại Dương Mất Tích (Sách Tô Màu Dành Cho Người Lớn) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

I usually like historical fiction, but this particular example has been so mitigated by the poorly-hidden didactic tautology of its too-many-cooks legion of anonymous authors and editors that it was rather difficult to enjoy. It also fell into a similar trap to the somewhat similar 'Da Vinci Code', in that it utilized a lot of poorly-researched materials and claimed them as fact. A lot of the data matched up poorly with other historical accounts, especially when it came to numerical data. It seems that the authors of this book had a need for an epic beyond epics, and several bodycounts beyond the capability of a pre-modern war. There was also a problem with the moral and ethical position presented by the book. Normally, I'm not one to nit-pick about such things, since the exploration of ethicism is an important and interesting philosophical task; but, again, this book went in so many different directions with it that it was difficult to keep up. Though the intermittent noir-ish first-person narrative made a lot of moral claims about peace and justice and acceptance, the actual actions depicted by the self-same 'protagonist' were often in complete contrast, such as when he killed all the people in the world except one family. In fact, the entire book seemed to be filled with sensationalist violence, sex, and incest. It's surprising that I haven't heard more crimes blamed on this book, which often orders the reader to kill people by throwing stones at them (I've heard the sequel, the Qur'an, is even worse). Eventually, I began to suspect that the book was some sort of in-joke. I think that when all of the editors and writers saw what the other ones were writing, they decided to take their names off the book. Eventually, I guess they just decided to pull a sort of ultimate 'Alan Smithee'; but of course, once all culpability is gone, I think a lot of the authors lost their will to make this into a good book, and so it just got published 'as is'. I know there are a lot of fans of this book, which makes sense, I guess, since it is really a lot like that Da Vinci Code book, which was also a bestseller. It is pretty fantastical and has a lot of really strong characters, like Jesus (though he's a bit of a Mary-Sue, isn't he?) and Onan. One of the main reasons I read it was because there's this really awesome Fanfic this guy Milton wrote about it, and apparently a lot of other authors were inspired by it, but I have to admit, this is one case where the Fanfic is a lot better than the original. I guess it's like how sometimes, the first example of a genre ends up not really fitting because it feels so unsophisticated and erratic. I know that it can take a long time to try to get these ideas down pat. Maybe someone will rewrite it someday and try to get it to make some sense. Then again, it wasn't that great in the first place. There was some really great writing in the book, though. Some of the poetic statements were really cool, like 'do unto others' or 'through a glass darkly', but I heard that those parts were stolen from Shakespeare, who stole them from Kyd, so I'm not really sure what to believe. I think this is one of those cases where the controversy surrounding the book really trumps the book itself, like 'The Catcher in the Rye' or 'Gigli'. In fact, the Bible is a lot like Gigli.

2019-03-26 02:31

Thực Dưỡng Macrobiotics Hồi Xuân Và Sống Thọ Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

I approached this book very cautiously because I've seen several lukewarm reviews (before Deja Dei's which convinced me to read it). Also, I like both steampunk and fantasy, but finding steampunk that satisfies me is rare and there are so many fantasy books out there that they started to blur together. After reading the book, I can say that it was better than I expected. The world building was detailed, especially clockworks and how they functioned. I also liked the overlapping of the "real" and Other world and descriptions of ever changing fae city quarter. The poverty, child labor, descriptions of dirty city streets and crime were balanced with characters' will to live and find their place in the world. I liked the character of Querry. He is an alley cat really: a thief, living on the outskirts of society, a bit of slut and a rascal. But, he also possesses innate goodness and strong protective streak. He is also, surprisingly, a dreamer and idealist who even in the direst of circumstances sees the possibility of better future, happier life. At one point, he tells Reg he would rather live a few years as a free man and then die than live thirty years in misery. This line perfectly defines him and explains his recklessness. Frolic is a lovely character: innocent, playful, loving, curious about the world and his place in it. He doesn't understand human casual cruelty and obvious injustices that plague the world. He is not weak though - he is faster, stronger, more skillful than any human and, because he is what he is, he understands the intricacies of the clockworks. I couldn't really connect to Reg. I didn't resent his choices in the first half of the book. After all, it wasn't difficult to understand why he craved normalcy after the childhood he and Quarry had. It was more that I couldn't connect to him throughout the entire book because he was the least developed, but especially in the second part when he used I instead of we so many times that it got on my nerves: I love Frolic, I need to save Frolic, he needs more time with Frolic... Reg is the main reason why the menage didn't really work for me. The other big reason is that the entire book is told from Querry's point of view, so we don't get to see the period when Frolic and Reg got close. We were told that it happened, but that is not the same thing. Rather than menage, this is more a set of twos: Querry and Reg, Querry and Frolic, Reg and Frolic. Except one short sex scene, they never work on page as three men in a relationship. Personally, I think the entire book would have worked better without Reg. But, since he is here, the authors would have to work really, really hard in the sequel to make me believe in this relationship. I did love other secondary characters, especially Dink, marvelous inventor and junk collector, and Querry's "gentleman", powerful fae who set him on the search for Frolic in the first place. He never comes across as human with pointy ears, which is so often the case. In fact, the only time he shows "human" emotions is in interaction with his human lover. But, I wanted to know more about him and I wanted to get at least some hint how some unanswered questions will be resolved (see Nikyta's review for those). The action was exciting, fast-paced and together with the world building and characters individually (rather than characters in the relationship) this was a solid, imaginative work. These elements are also the reason that I rounded up my rating to four stars. Boots for the Gentleman was also the first book by these authors that I've read and I'm looking forward to their other works set in this world, but especially the sequel to this book.

Người đọc Diane Gallardo từ Yiğitler/Diyarbakır, Turkey

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.