Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
It's sort of nonfiction, but there is a lot of speculative elements. It's written for younger readers. I really enjoyed it when I was a kid.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Mia Thermopolis
A battle of two races, action, war, drama, teen romance. These are all the things that happen in the book "I am number four" by Pittacus Lore. This is the story of a boy from a different planet is be hunted by another race called the Mongorians which wiped out his entire planet. He is one of the last seven of his kind. Also, the last hope of his kind. They have killed three, and he is next. But is he next or are the Mongorians trying to kill him? This is a single series book at the time. But due to how the story is told I predict there being another book or maybe even two more. This is all up to Pittacus Lore. I hope that he does make more because his books are books of great entertainment. The genre of this book is science fiction. The reason being that there are extraterrestrials with powers that defy the natural laws. Such as aliens coming from another planet. Along with creature that can shape shift. There for I say its genre is science fiction. This is the conclusion to my review on the book "I am number four" by Pittacus Lore.
"The Hobbit" was the best fantasy novel I have ver read. The detail throughout the entire book made you feel as though you were there. J.R.R Tolkien had a unique way of creating detial in an exciting manor. The use of the charecters was uncanning. There were tweleve flat charecters that made the others seem hilarious which gave this book some comidic moments along with the usual serious story line. The author didn't leave any boring moments throughout the entire book. There was always a problem or something for the main charecters to figure out. Sometimes in the book there were things that don't make sence untill you read the lord of the rings which can be a little dull at times. Other then that this book has no flaws I take pity on whoever doesn't read this book.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phương Bạch Vũ
I did not actually read this specific copy but I can highly recommend this play. It took me a very long time to read as I am not from 1600. However, it was well worth the work. My favorite part was the last Act. Watch out for the fencing!
Cinda Depressing but good story.
Seit vielen Jahrhunderten fasziniert die Melancholie große Denker. Sie verträgt sich nicht so recht mit den deklarierten Leit-Tugenden einer Gesellschaft, deren größter Trick es letztlich war, dieses Gefühl, das so viel mehr als bloße Traurigkeit ist, mit der modernen Medizin endgültig zu stigmatisieren: als Depression. Da es aber gerade in der heutigen postmodernen Welt an Gründen für Schwermut nicht mangelt, kommen in dieser Anthologie wider aller in Endlosschleife wiederholten Heilsversprechen einige der kritischen Geister zu Wort. Nicht zuletzt deshalb, weil viele von ihnen – darunter auch der in der Textsammlung zu Wort kommende Nikolaus Lenau – selbst "von einer Art Gravitation nach dem Unglücke regiert" werden. Sprachlich vollendete und das Sujet ausleuchtende Texte finden sich u.a. von Petrarca, natürlich Burton, Pascal, Kant, Schopenhauer, Kierkegaard, Cioran bis hin zu Grass und Földényi, um nur einige zu nennen. Abgerundet wird das Buch durch das geschliffene Vorwort von Ulrich Horstmann, der offensichtlich gut kennt, worüber er schreibt.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Rasul Gamzatov
Very disappointing. Rapture better improve! Review to come.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Jennifer L. Holm
Among conservative evangelicals (which I am), you are not supposed to like this book. It is "heresy," ad infinitum, etc. However, as I began reading it I liked alot of what I was reading. This doesn't go without saying that there were things I didn't like or found myself in disagreement. But, like any book out there, I rarely agree with everything in any book (except the Bible, of course!). As far as the writing style, Young is an excellent story teller and did a great job of description of the people and places. As good as it is, I do disagree with Eugene Peterson's praise that this book "has the potential to do for our generation what John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress did for his." Hold on now. Pilgrim's Progress is a work of art. It is a sustained allegory all throughout weaving Scripture throughout almost every sentence. Also, John Bunyan's work not only affected his generation, but is still affecting people to this very day, some 400 years later. So, to make a statement such as Peterson's is either ridiculously premature or daringly prophetic. Only time will tell if The Shack will be able to match Bunyan's classic. Somehow, I doubt many will be reading this 400 years from now (and I say that having liked much of the book). The author obviously writes from a Christian perspective and so I critique in light of this perspective as well. The things that I loved about the book: God desires a relationship with you (HUGE), an emphasis on grace and dependence on God, the grand story of redemption from Creation to New Heavens and New Earth, acknowledgement of man's sinfulness and our ability to screw up the world we live in, the creation of the world, an honest tackling and wrestling with the issue of the problem of evil and suffering and how to reconcile that with who God is as Creator and All-Knowing, Powerful, and Everywhere, a Trinitarian view of God as three persons in one God working together in intimacy and absolute unity, a solid view of God's holiness in that he is unlike anyone else (in a category of his own, beyond time and space, etc.). The things that I didn't like about the book: 1) Humanity was created to be loved by God instead of being created by God to worship him and reflect his glory. I would say that we are loved by God so that we can worship him, 2) God limits himself when we talk to him so as not to be bored and know everything we are going to tell him about like a parent talking to a child. It is true that God limits himself in certain times and that our revelation from him is filtered through language as well as our finiteness, but God does know everything. The Scripture clearly states that he already knows what we are going to ask before we ask it, 3) his explanation of submission within the Godhead (or lack thereof) and his continuing definition of submission doesn't match much of the teaching of Scripture and the definition of the Greek word. I think I know what he was trying to say, but his explanation seemed to only muddy the water, 4)a distorted view of the Law vs. grace. He makes the common mistake of many Christians that God didn't desire relationship when He gace the Israelites the law. However, the Law was given in the context of his relationship with Israel as their redeemer and God. The Law was given so they would know how to respond to a holy God and how to live in his presence. It is within this context that I would say that God does have expectations on us, but not devoid of a loving relationship. Or course, some of these things could also just be an issue of semantics since for some people "law" sounds cold and harsh when it really just means "teaching," 5) the lack of the Bible as a help. Although I believe that every Christian needs to connect with God personally and emotionally, the Bible is also the main resource that God uses in our lives. I found it odd that Mack wasn't directed to connect with some of the painful heart cries in the Psalms, etc., and 6) All humans are forgiven. I don't see this in Scripture anywhere. I do see that God loves the world, but I do not see forgiveness for all people anywhere in the Bible. Of course, most people have reacted strongly to God the Father being a large, Black woman who later changes into a man with a cool pony tail and the Holy Spirit being an Asian woman. Within the realm of creative fiction, I understand why Mack needed to have God love him as a mother before he could love and trust him as a Papa (or as Romans 8 says "Abba" or "Daddy"). Although I don't believe God the Father is a woman, I don't have a problem in the realm of fiction for God to be portrayed in a number of ways similar to how C.S. Lewis describes God and Christian truths in the Narnia books, etc. Personally, I think the book could have made the same points without using the imagery the author used, but he's the author and this was the decision he made. On a personal level, there were several times where I was impacted emotionally at a deep level because I identified with some of Mack's emotional hang-ups as well as when he tells his older daughter that it wasn't her fault (I burst into tears! It was a good thing I was in my hotel room!). Overall, I give the book only 3 stars and one thumb up because of some of the confusion I think the book creates. Having said this, I enjoyed reading it and think that many people unknowingly will begin to think about God and start asking questions about their relationship to him and that is always a good thing!
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Linh Chi
This book had a very interesting subject but as the book wore on, I got the distinct feeling that perhaps this elusive Sir John Mandeville wasn't quite as important as the author was making him out to be. I also wondered at the relevance of the author's traveling to exotic locales in search of Sir John. The book was extremely interesting (and even amusing at points) with respects to the author's various travel escapades but the whole Sir John angle almost seemed unncessary. It was a nice little flair, but he really seemed superfluous. Of course, I wouldn't have found the book without it's reference to Sir John (I was in the medieval history section, what can I say?) so I supose it's all for the best that Mandeville is the subject. Anyway, it was an excellently written book with wonderful stories on every page. The author, rather than Sir John, came out as the hero in my opinion and I loved every moment of it. Unfortunately, there was very little closure at the end so I was still left in some degree of confusion regarding who this Sir John Mandeville bloke was and why I had just read an entire book supposedly about him, but it was a good read nonetheless.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hạ Vũ
I was conflicted about this book being Northern Sudanese myself, and it was a tough read. Still I liked the book and toward the end even understood why Mr Eggers chose to use the voice he did. While I don't like that voice I feel like it is consistent with what a non-writer would say in telling his story. It doesn't do the story justice in that sense but fortunately the story manages to carry you along. It fills one with shame and relief at his own good fortune but also rage at the half-truths we've all been subjected to. It's the rarest of stories: one which make you question things that seemed fundamental to you before an it's a pity it wasn't written just a bit better.
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.