Jovan Ukropina từ Luján, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina

ukropina

05/11/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Jovan Ukropina Sách lại (10)

2019-10-04 08:30

Truyện Kể Cho Bé Trước Giờ Đi Ngủ - Ngày Xửa Ngày Xưa: Người Đẹp Ngủ Trong Rừng Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều tác giả

Very good book. Would be great for a teen ministry for girls. Great self esteem building resource. A must read.

2019-10-04 09:30

Tớ Muốn Ăn Tụy Của Cậu Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Sumino Yoru

Maravillosa y terrible.

2019-10-04 10:30

AQ - Chỉ Số Vượt Khó Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Amazing

2019-10-04 11:30

12 Con Giáp - Tái bản 03/07/2007 Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phong Sinh

Good idea, but this is crappy book, especially the last third, which really had me rolling my eyes. The young girls who came from Paris to New France may have been like Laure, but I doubt it. Why on earth would the author have her have an affair with an Algonquin - stupid, stupid stupid. She seems very hung up on how things smell too.

2019-10-04 12:30

Khác Biệt Để Bứt Phá (Tái bản năm 2016) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Jason Fried

Over Christmas Break, my friend Liz twisted my arm (OK, there wasn't really any twisting involved) and convinced me to watch The Hobbit (subtitle eludes me at the moment). I love it...to know how much I love it you should really read this review on Goodreads. It not only talks about the book, but about how much this new movie R.O.C.K.S. and it saves me the trouble of going into much detail about the movie and it saves me having to talk about the book vs. the movie. I only want to talk about the movie in relation to the fact that it made me read the book again because: 1] I wanted to know why there were so many people (there are people who think this, really!?) who didn't want Jackson to screw up their Hobbityness...he really doesn't screw up anything AT. ALL. 2] I wanted to see how many pages of the book were actually in the movie (80...yes, a 2 hour and 45 minute movie is 80 pages of my version of The Hobbit) 3] I didn't want to spend the next movies experiencing strange flashback/amnesia wondering what parts were added/changed/deleted while simultaneously remembering... 4] And, I couldn't remember how many dwarves died and I definitely needed to know so I wouldn't be surprised...I hate being surprised I don't know when I read the book the first time, before high school is all I know, and I remember thinking it was a hard read, I realize now that was due to the fact that there are 12 dwarf names, at least 6 place names, so many types of characters to keep track of like trolls, goblins, different types of elves and a couple of wizards, several flashbacks with more dwarf names and places, and several big words. I love that the copy I own has the dwarves in barrels with cute little Bilbo on top as they rage down the river as that's one of my favorite parts. I rated it 4-stars from my memory and, after re-reading and keeping it at four...I'm still confused about the big battle at the end...I mean why? who? but, I didn't mind all the death and the ending is beautiful and real and bittersweet. It makes me want to re-read the rest of the series. I can see how someone could become obsessed with the Tolkien universe. Like I've always said, JK Rowling could take a lesson or two...

2019-10-04 13:30

Lịch Sử Y Học Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Lois N. Magner

Teared up a bit I must admit, although as is John Green's talent, the sadness of the story didn't feel overly drawn-out. He also has a knack for writing main characters I enjoy reading, which he does again as effortlessly as ever. Perhaps I'm growing out of young adult fiction, but the second half of the plot disappointed me. The characters' choices and reactions seemed a little forced, yet not unrealistic enough to belong in an epic or absurd enough to be found in magical realism. My disbelief removed me from the story a bit more than I wanted, or am used to.

2019-10-04 14:30

Cơn Sốt Lúc Bình Minh Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Gárdos Péter

After I finished writing my guide to the Book of Job, several people told me I ought to read The Shack. I wasn't that keen. But my Pastor handed me a copy, so how could I resist anymore? The Shack by William Paul Young (Windblown Media, 2007) is one of those publishing phenomenons à la The Celestine Prophecy (on Amazon at The Celestine Prophecy ), where it seems like everyone has read it or is about to read it. Most people I knew enjoyed The Shack hugely; some weren't all that thrilled with the writing. I personally found it lightweight but with one essential truth in it, a truth that few who talk forgiveness rarely discuss or even mention. Young wrote The Shack originally for his children, in obedience to his wife. His imaginative story unfolds in a way that slowly reveals the tragedy that changed the protagonist Mackenzie fundamentally. The tragedy happened in or was traced back to a shack in the middle of the National Reserve wilderness in Oregon. It's a bleak place of dereliction, loneliness, and loss. Young said in an interview that the shack is a metaphor for a place where we get hurt and stuck. A few years after the tragedy, on a brittle, cold day, Mackenzie is called to go back to the shack through a note. When he later spoke to his wife, he chose not to tell her about this odd note. It's a telling little detail about how we justify leaving people out when in fact it's all about our own fear and selfishness. Up to this point, The Shack is a traditional novel, firmly grounded in reality. The language is ordinary; the emotions evoked not all that powerful. I found for such a tragedy as Mack experienced, I was not all that moved. I think more evocative language, better word usage, less artificiality in the build up to the big reveal, would probably have created a more passionate response. But if the very mention of child and tragedy in the same sentence moves you to tears, then this will do it. When Mack hikes up to the shack and enters it, all that reality morphs; he enters a fantastical world. He encounters God in three. God is a black woman; Jesus is a carpenter; and the Holy Spirit is a being hard to see and pin down. The setting morphs from bleak and inhospitable to a flourishing summer, an inviting garden, a rather obvious metaphor for what it's like to be without God and then with God. Young uses these characters to show the reader how the Trinity works and to challenge the stereotype of God being only male. I'm not sure how well it works as a visual aid to the Trinity; I feel no more enlightened than before. Yet it is a creative way to show the Divine. And he does a good job of illustrating an ideal relationship, such as exists between the three God in one. Mack spends time with each manifestation of God and finally feels his way through his grief into acceptance of his loss. He comes to regret not telling his wife of the note. Near the end of his time with this entertaining Trinity, Mack receives redeeming gifts that are entirely in the realm of fiction. Us humans would not likely have God descend upon us and show us our dead kin. In that respect, although it was a nice feel-good moment, I found its artificiality, its non-connection to real suffering and how God usually works in our lives, a bit off-putting. Yet Young goes from that trite scene to a compelling conversation about a truth I so rarely hear today. It's become commonplace to hear zealous talk about forgiveness, about how we should forgive for our own sake, to make us better, that it has nothing to do with the person we're forgiving, that's why we ought to forgive. Gag me. But even leaving aside the idea of making forgiveness palatable to the masses by transforming it into a selfish act, forgiveness is often foisted upon Christians as a must-do, with no acknowledgement that forgiveness is only one-third of the equation. Forgiveness is not reconciliation, and it is not forgetfullness. Yet it's either portrayed as a selfish act that has nothing to do with mercy or reconciliation or as a way to kiss and make up with your oppressor, the one who harmed you. Neither is forgiveness. Kissing and making up is reconciling and is also only one-third of the equation. The last third that connects the two is the one who harmed you acknowledging the harm and asking for mercy. Forgiveness, asking for mercy, and reconciliation are all about our relationship with the other. They are not supposed to be solitary activities, even though it seems too often one has to forgive in solitude or send a request for mercy off into the void. "Forgiveness in no way requires that you trust the one you forgive. But should they finally confess and repent, you will discover a miracle in your own heart that allows you to reach out and begin to build between you a bridge of reconciliation. And sometimes -- and this may seem incomprehensible to you right now -- that road may even take you to the miracle of fully restored trust." "...forgiveness does not excuse anything." (Page 226, God to Mack.) The Shack is a pleasant read. I would give it 2.5 stars, but can't on this site (that I know of), so I erred on the side of generosity and gave it 3. Its theology is not to everyone's taste -- as evidenced on YouTube. It ends on a good note; it wraps things up nicely. I often think that the ending of the Book of Job is also a nice wrap up that has no basis in reality. We may often be redeemed in our suffering, but the questions that the tragedy raise remain unanswered and the losses don't get replaced. Does a book such as this need to end in this way though? There was a feeling awhile ago that for a book to be authentic it has to be realistic. But fiction is also escape. And people who are suffering greatly like nothing better than a happy ending, like Job had, like Mack does. Young gives his readers the happy, neat ending they crave. It is the reason for The Shack's popularity I'm sure. The Shack is available at Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.co.uk, among many, many retailers. ----------------------------- *I originally wrote this review on my website at http://jeejeebhoy.ca back in 2009.

2019-10-04 15:30

Thay Đổi 1% Cách Lãnh Đạo, 99% Đạt Được Thành Công Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Eitaro Kono

Excellent!

2019-10-04 16:30

Pao Và Những Người Bạn 4: Cùng Đánh Răng Nào Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Michael Moore- love him, or hate him- this book really opened my eyes.

2019-10-04 17:30

Quan Trường Hủ Bại Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Chu Kim Thái

بابک احمدی خود در مقدمه می گوید که به خاطر زبان، و به دنبال درک عشق عارفانه ای که امثال عطار داشته اند، سراغ تذکرة الاولیاء رفته است، و نه به این دلیل که "منطق غیر نقادانه ی سخن عرفانی" را ستایش می کند. چهار گزارش از تذکرةالاولیاء، در این شیفتگی به زبان مادری، خود زبانی شیرین و وصاف دارد. نگاه به عرفان و کلام عرفا، بی آن که در آن غرقه شویم، آموزش شگفتی ست که بابک احمدی در این روش دارد.

Người đọc Jovan Ukropina từ Luján, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.