Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Annie Ernaux
Good read, interesting, but fairly predictable twist.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Thùy Linh
Great for what it is.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Thư Quân
This story is the epitome of "Three's a crowd," especially when two of the three have very different personalities. Where Goose is calm, patient and enjoys peace and quiet, Thistle is loud, competitive and busy, busy, busy. This is a good book to read to children who are feeling competition or conflict in their friendships. We enjoyed reading this story together.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Rachel Gibson
Largely boring. Not much happens but given the nature of the situation these characters find themselves in, it is not unexpected. Mostly the book makes you paranoid about whether you have enough food, toilet paper, and cat litter in case the world comes to an end.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
If you need to understand ADHD or for your classroom as a read aloud. this is the perfect book!
Violently offensive and Bowel-looseningly hilarious :)
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nguyễn Văn Hoà
Hoffnung in einer aussichtslosen Lage. Kann der Bau einer Geige Leben retten? Die Geschichte des Geigenbauers Daniel im KZ wird in verschiedenen Episoden erzählt, leider sehr sprunghaft - was etwas verwirrt. Auch wurden interessante Szenen ausgelassen, und lieber nur kurz zum Verständnis des Lesers wiedergegeben. Auch der Stil hat mich nicht ganz überzeugt.
Crusoe's whining got on my nerves and his saying that he must have been cursed because he didn't listen to his father and essentially please God by doing so. I also got tired of hearing about all the things he built and things he did to survive.
currently reading this... translated from french. sort of fanciful writing that is fun to escape in. more later...
Michaels, with Robert Balling, does what he does best: confronts some of the distortions and extreme claims about climate science which show up in the media or come out of the mouths of politicians. He does this not only with analysis but also with studies published in refereed journals. As usual, he shows once again that science is never "settled" and that climate science, as is the case with any other science, is far more complex than the headlines and pronouncements you get in public. One thing I appreciated about this book was his addressing how, without malfeasance, honorable scientists can end up biasing the kinds of research that is done and gets reported. This was in a later chapter, and he suggests a more open refereeing process as a possible corrective. I do have to say that I found this book a bit more dry than a previous book of his I read (Meltdown). But, the reason it's drier is because he spends a lot more time explaining experiments, and what they show. He also explains how various statistics are derived and how they can get skewed, depending on sampling, etc. There are a great many graphs, which I found helpful. I think anyone who enjoys following reasoning and analysis will find this book interesting and enlightening. You can't come away from the book without realizing how complex the study of the climate is, and how simplistic (if not outright wrong) the pap you get in the media is. (BTW, that applies to almost all science stories reported in the media, no matter what area of science or medicine it involves.)
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.