Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phương Lan
I've read one other Picoult book, and may well read more. She doesn't write high literature but she's a talented author in that she manages to create very real, very believable characters and put them in extraordinary situations . . . just ordinary people who have their world turned upside down - and some how have it become a lot richer, much more three dimensional than, say, something like a Law & Order episode, which is the closest analogue. This novel dealt with an Amish girl accused of neonaticide (killing her newborn) and the woman who, against-all odds winds up not only defending her, but living on the farm with her family. Because of the blurb on the back, I went into the book with preconceived notions regarding the girl's guilt, and I was not wrong. However, the circumstances surrounding it -- and the ways in which the crime played out -- weren't quite as I expected (though I was close!), which was satisfying. I like things to work out not quite as I predicted.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phan Đình Huấn
Nice overview of the Medieval world- lots of pictures. Not for a serious student of this timeperiod.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
Adorable concept, lovely presentation. Some of the recipes include difficult-to-find ingredients, but the boxes are beautiful AND balanced meals.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Etsumi Haruki
I was savaged by a miniature poodle the other day--wait--no, someone protested my review of The Giver the other day. If you have any pent-up rage from that college lit teacher who forced you to think about books, be sure to stop by and spew some incoherent vitriol--my reviews are now a socially acceptable site of catharsis for the insecure. In any case, one of them made the argument that children need new versions of great books that are stupider, because children are just stupid versions of normal people. Happily-enough, The Giver is a totally stupid version of A Clockwork Orange or whatever Dystopian book (actually, it's a rewrite of Ayn Rand's Anthem). Coincidentally, in my review of Alice In Wonderland, I happen to put forth my own philosophy regarding children's books. In short: they should present a complex, strange, many-faceted, and never dumbed-down world, because presenting a simple, one-sided, dumbed-down world both insults and stultifies a child's mind. However, if someone were to say that this book were a childrenized version of Starship Troopers, I wouldn't sic a poodle on them. Both present a human/bug war, deal with the issues of death, war, the military complex, human interaction, personal growth, and all that good stuff. Also, both authors have their heads up their asses and there must be a pretty good echo in there since they keep yelling their hearts out about one personal opinion or another. However, Orson Scott Card doesn't get into his pointless author surrogate diatribes until the second book in this series, so we may enjoy the first one uninterrupted. So it's a pretty good book for children, and like romeo and Juliet, it's easy to see the appeal: kid defeats bullies and plays videogames to save the world(in one of the sequels, they save the world by making angry comments on the internet--surprising that one isn't more popular here). But more than that, it's not a bad book in general, so I guess I don't have to bother defining it as dumbed-down, or 'for kids'. Then again, a lot of grown-ups seem like they need their books dumbed-down. Just look at The Da Vinci Code compared to The Satanic Verses, or Foucault's Pendulum; or all three compared to The Illuminatus Trilogy. I'm pretty sure when it comes to stupid versions of things, adults have the monopoly.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Erich Maria Remarque
This book was good. Although not all the characters came across as whole people, there was enough in here to create an absorbing read on forgiveness. I like Lily as a narrator. I think the book would make a great young adult novel as there is much to think about with the backdrop of 1960s South and inter-racial relationships---which was more interesting than the connections to bee society.
I love Patrick Ducharme. He's a wonderful character that Picoult made.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhóm bút Lovedia
This book is hiliarious and had me laughing at loud a LOT. If you haven't read Jen Lancaster, you must, or else we can't be friends anymore.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Robert James Waller
Somehow even more over the top than Da Vinci Code
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều Tác Giả
Reeducation book #3. Not as good as "Skills and Strategies...," although it is simpler to read and more accessible. There is some information here that wasn't really covered in "Skills and Strategies," or not in the same way, but mostly they overlap and "Skills and Strategies" goes into a lot more detail, most of which is actually useful. I guess I would say that "Skills and Strategies" analyzes what the therapist should do in a session on a micro level, whereas "Counseling Strategies is more macro and superficial. Additionally, the copy I'm reading is a very old edition and somewhat dated (one of the disadvantages of trying to do this in Israel). Maybe subsequent editions are better; I have no way of knowing.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Tùng Ưng
I think I've grown too old for Meg Cabot... or this book just sucked.
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.