Rachel Gallea từ Chakbasutiya, Uttarakhand , India

rational_aze_esign

11/22/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Rachel Gallea Sách lại (10)

2020-01-10 22:31

Quy Chuẩn Kỹ Thuật Quốc Gia Về An Toàn Cháy Cho Nhà, Công Trình Hạ Tầng Kỹ Thuật Đô Thị Và Quy Trình Mới Nhất Về Đấu Thầu Lập, Quản Lý, Quyết Toán Chi Phí Đầu Tư, Thi Công Xây Dựng Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều Tác Giả

A great sci-fi book.

2020-01-10 23:31

Little Stories - To Make You A Good Person Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Every once in a while there's that debut novel that reads as if the author is not just polished but already has a collection of work under their belt. Samantha is that writer. Not only is Before Ever After a real treat but the story itself is magical. From start to middle to finish the story makes you laugh (I had some major laughing out loud moments complete with awkward stares from nearby people), it makes you cry, but above all it makes you believe not just in love itself but the power it holds. Even though it's only a story the characters become friends, they become people you want in your life. Plus, Max the main male character, makes you want to not just own a chicken farm but makes you wish that you had your own Max in your life. A gem, a treat, a comedic relief, from beginning to end this story entertains and restores ones belief in the power of love.

2020-01-11 00:31

Lớp Học Mật Ngữ - Tập Đặc Biệt (Tặng Kèm Bộ Lịch Khổ Lớn 12 Cung Hoàng Đạo) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: B.R.O

This is an incredibly gorgeous piece of writing. Please read it. Now.

2020-01-11 01:31

Màu Rừng Ruộng Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

He may be ambivalent about his faith and he may have been ambivalent about his girlfriend before he got dumped, but about Israel I'm not so sure. He's definitely proud of himself for making a Palestinian friend and for eventually asking and answering questions most Jews manage to suppress and ignore- even the ones living in Israel. He finds out his view of history learned at his Canadian Zionist school was a lie (propaganda, indoctrination, IMO). He's haunted continually by this composite character representing the school like a true victim of serious semi-successful brainwashing. He's got several composite characters and dead people or those not in the country speaking to him. It was creative and kind of fun, but in a memoir, I'm not sure I liked it. He does have some breakthroughs. There were in fact people on the land (Israel) before them (Israeli Jews) and Palestinians didn't leave of their own free will and did in fact want to come back. Also, he learns that not everyone hates Jews and there is such thing as Palestinians and the map of Israel he had burned in his brain as a child was wrong. I think he still holds onto the lie that it was the Jews who made the desert bloom, though. What is shocking is how I hear people constantly bemoan the fact that Palestinians are being indoctrinated to hate Jews in textbooks and schools, while there is nothing about this propaganda Jews learn in school, not just in Israel, but all over the world (and the fact that for Palestinians it is illegal to learn about their own history or literature, etc). Interestingly, at Jonathan's home synagogue, the men and women are separate and the women can't touch the Torah and men and women can't touch each other. I found it kind of funny given the fact that there has been so much press lately about mosques and how people believe Islam is the problem, after all, look how they treat women- separate to pray. Callers to radio shows justify their ill feelings for the mosque in NY due to this separation which doubtless many Jews in NY (and all over the world) also practice! When he talks to other Jews about his questioning of what he's been taught, he seems to oppose them, but does so as though he tossed a coin and he doesn't know why he's saying what he's saying. When he talks about his orthodox friends, he longs for the faith they have and admires them greatly, which is not so bad. What they say about Palestinians bothers him (also good), but not in the way Rana's acceptance of suicide bombing does- he's ready to end that friendship. The fact that his friend, Rana, supports suicide bombing as a general concept shocks him. Funny when you think of his heroes in Israeli history who were responsible for some pretty horrible things, but such is the contradiction that is Israel. When he finds out about this, he wonders why he can question his faith and position, but she can't. He also says at some point that they both have had to question their Israeli educations and she found it almost as hard as he did to criticize and question her education and (for her) Israeliness. I wonder if he thinks the Jews could have won their state with non-violence. Does he regret that they used violence so that he can freely (and cheaply if he'd taken one of Israel's many offers to Jews) travel at the expense of so many lives long gone and so many under occupation? He visits a community, Oasis of Peace, where Israelis and Palestinians live together equally, but he calls this fabricated peace rather than a choice or an alternative, as they consider it. He goes with an activist whose group is intent on posting signs telling of the state's real history, or at least a sanitized version letting people know of the Palestinian villages that Israel tried to erase. He's not terribly critical of them, but it is clear that while he seems glad he knows the truth, he doesn't really want to get involved in educating others and seems on the fence about the whole thing- he may not be as happy to know the truth as I thought. The real peace, is the one in the Shimon-Abu Dalo residence, he thinks. I disagree. They hate each other, but they don't kill each other. It's the reason for his trip to Israel. He wants to write a play about it and goes to do research and to find out about the nagging questions relating to what he learned in school. He inexplicably goes to see Divine Intervention at the Toronto Film Festival, meets Rana who tells him about this house. I hope he made a great play because I don't think his trip was too enlightening for him otherwise. When Palestinians would talk history with him, he wouldn't be able to concentrate either because the IDF was shooting or low blood sugar or whatever. He did seem to conclude that his Zionist education was a bit biased and maybe not factually correct. But he wants it to be. He wants the faith of those people and to not ask questions. He admires his "War of Independence" heroes (maybe just remembering as a child?) and how kibbutzim were instrumental in the war. He can't let go of the Jewish state idea, which precludes equality and democracy, even though he kind of understands that implication. He does less analysis and more general reporting of Israeli attitudes than some memoirs. One such experience that sticks out is how in his visit to the kibbutz, I and apparently he, expected pretty liberal attitudes about Palestinians and was surprised. He asked them if they would let Palestinians live in the kibbutz, given their values and claims of interacting with Palestinians. They weren't forthcoming. When they bragged about going to the West Bank, it was not really in a Palestinian village as they had said and it was owned by Palestinians serving Jewish patrons. I've been able to get my hands on far more Jewish memoirs than Palestinian ones. This one was pretty good. It didn't make me nearly as mad as Prisoners by Jeffery Goldberg. I was only mildly disappointed with the evolution in this book. He was able to reverse some of his Zionist brainwashing and begin thinking for himself. He was ashamed of himself for doing this, though, and seemed to want to want the faith of people who thought Palestinians were dogs. He made some Palestinian friends and asked some questions, but he still seems to think they are guilty or responsible for the mess they are in. He does seem to be for cooperation and peace and not so obsessed with the Holocaust (like American Jews) and manufactured victimhood that it causes moral myopia. Maybe we'll have to wait for Israel to allow Palestinians freedom of movement and to study their history and write about it without it being illegal for Palestinian memoirs to become more widely available.

2020-01-11 02:31

Tiếp Bước Người Đi Trước Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Phạm Phương Thảo

This is probably my favorite short story, which was originally published in Gaiman's Angles & Visitations (which I had autographed by the Mr Gaiman himself - I've met him twice at different book signings in NYC and Massachusetts). This edition is in graphic novel/comic book format, and while I generally love graphic novels and great artwork that goes with it, but in my opinion, this story is much, much better in prose. Not all stories should be given the "comic book treatment" (just as not all novels should be made into movies), and I think Murder Mysteries is much better in prose, which is why I would suggest reading it in "Angels and Visitations". My imagination of the characters and events in Murder Mysteries is more powerful than any artist (w/ all due respect) could possibly render. Incidentally, I also have this short story on Word or PDF so if you're a friend, give me a holla and I can email it to you.

2020-01-11 03:31

Từ Điển Anh - Việt Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hoàng Anh

This was a really good historical record. It contained great info on what was happening in the early days of the university as seen by the brothers living there.

2020-01-11 04:31

Rèn Kỹ Năng Làm Văn Và Bài Văn Mẫu Lớp 12 (Tập 1) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

Cute. Fun. Easy. Sassy.

2020-01-11 05:31

2500 Câu Đàm Thoại Tiếng Anh Trong Các Tình Huống Thông Dụng Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Đức Tín

After such a long wait - what a disappointment. Seven short chapters, another continent - generally rubbish. "Writing is a job"

2020-01-11 06:31

108 Truyện Mẹ Kể Con Nghe - Tái bản 06/2013 Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Thùy Linh

I always believed that Jack London kind of sucked. Like most people, I read 'To Build a Fire' and Call of the Wild in school, and was bored senseless, wishing the hero would just freeze to death faster. John Barleycorn proved me completely wrong. In it, London is funny and sharp and angry about all the right things. Lately it's been marketed as a pro-prohibition book, which I think obscures the point. London is not concerned with alcoholism as a disease. What he's trying to pin down is the malevolent spirit of the ancient god of drink, personified, as of old, as John Barleycorn. It's the best description I've ever read of the glories of drinking to excess - the shining nights, the wild tales, the companionship - and exactly why this is so dangerous to the thinking person. He argues that it's precisely the best, the strongest, the brightest, the wildest, who poison themselves with drinking, worn down by the dullness of normal life; that drinking becomes an adventure, a sign of courage and great-heartedness. But he also believes that John Barleycorn demands your life as payment, and brings, instead of wisdom, what he called 'the White Logic', a sort of super-lucid, nihilistic despair. The book is filled with these mystical, revelatory, poetic ravings, passages so beautiful I wish I could just tear them out and plaster them on walls for everyone to read. But there's tons of other great stuff in here, too - stories about the socialist movement, and about working in factories and hopping trains and grappling with cheap typewriters and sailing and fighting and oyster pirates and Aristophanes and loving and eating too much candy. It's been a great read, and it's given me a lot to think about. I mean, alcoholism is such an easy answer, isn't it? If you drink too much, you're an alcoholic; you have a disease, you need treatment. London's viewpoint is more complex and feels more valid: that you drink because that is what people of vision do, and you drink together, and your life is richer, and you put aside the injustices of the world - what he calls the cold iron collar around the neck of your soul. Therefore, change not yourself, but the world. I love it! The answer isn't repentance and detox and rehab and counseling, it's revolution!

2020-01-11 07:31

Luật Luật Sư 2013 (Đã Sửa Đổi, Bổ Sung) Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hoàng Anh

Người đọc Rachel Gallea từ Chakbasutiya, Uttarakhand , India

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.