Cười Học - Cải Thiện Cuộc Sống Bằng Tiếng Cười tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Haritha Venugopal haritaa — i liked the book, it had a good amount of hooks and interesting events that kept me reading. It was said and almost everyone should be able to relate to the main character. The author was very good at describing what is going on and what others look like. i was never confused about anything though out this book as well. I would recommend this to high schools and adults, I do not see anyone younger falling in love with this book.

Adam Dodd _aby_olada — By far the best book Shreve has written. Good story but nothing to really take away from it.

Joao Yang joaoyang — Zeer de moeite waard. Al kost het geen enkele moeite om het boek uit te lezen, je kunt niet stoppen zodra je begint. Opmerkelijk sterk op psychologisch vlak, en de Bijbelse visie op mens zijn is duidelijk merkbaar maar ligt er niet dik boven op. Humoristisch, inspirerend en geloofwaardig. Ik vind dat Nancy Rue een beter verhaal schrijft dan Lynn Austen en zeker met kop en schouders uitsteekt boven Francine Rivers.

Federica Balzarotti federicabalzarotti — I first read this at university, but decided that it was long past time to reread it. In the first few pages, I couldn't see why it had made such a strong impression on me. But by the end of the "Editor's Notes", I'd remembered. And there's so much about it that I'd forgotten - especially the latter part of it. So a rare star upgrade from my original rating. It tells the story of a 'justified' sinner, who believes he's already one of God's elect on Earth, and therefore his place in Heaven is already assured, and then throws a supernatural twist into it. Neatly told from from two different perspectives, it's a fascinating study of how the Devil can twist the beliefs of someone who things he's one of the Elect, and twist them on their head to make him destroy those who try to do good, and ultimately himself. In my view, the bit that's really clever about it, is that the first version of events you see is the more objective "Editor's Notes"; and then it revisits the same events - and many more - from the point of view of the 'justified sinner', who manages to rationalise murder as doing God's work, when in fact he's doing the complete opposite.