Địa Lý Ngũ Quyết Toàn thư - 3 Năm Tầm Long, 10 Năm Điểm Huyệt tải về miễn phí cuốn sách

Carl André carlandre — I greatly enjoy reading books about the inner workings of Hollywood, not specifically from the actor/producer standpoint, but from the less hot-shot and A list people like writers, cameramen, or even just critics. William Goldman's "Who Killed Hollywood" is one of my favorite books and one I always refer to when thinking about movies. And for this reason I picked up Bambi vs. Godzilla. While I have seen some of David Mamet's movies before, this is my fist experience with his writing. I know the man is a good writer, but he flaunts this fact often throughout the first and last third of the book, using incredibly cryptic phrases, flowery paragraphs, and incessantly verbose thought patterns. For such a proponent of "getting to the point," he doesn't follow his own advice. The best parts of the book are when he's talking about the thing he knows best: writing a story. For this section, the book is a must read, as it explains the duties of a writer from a master of the craft. However, when he went into the general business of the movie industry, he lost focus often and delved mostly into toothless bitching. Mamet is a wonderful cynic and can teach all inspiring cynics a trick or two, but his anger and vehemence feels misdirected and chained. He might be trying to burn some bridges, but isn't ready to light the first match. And for that, I cannot wholly recommend this book, except as an unbalanced attempt at sticking it to the big wigs in Hollywood. If you like that sort of thing, give it a try. Otherwise, it's merely ok.

Alina Belousova belousova — I had started and re-started this book a couple of times. I don't know what turned me away from it the first few times. It wasn't that I didn't enjoy the narrative, or that the content wasn't something I was interested in. I love zombies! And this is a take on zombies that you don't see very often: how real-world politics or nations might handle such an international crisis. I've been trying to figure out why it was sometimes a slow read for me, and why I didn't feel compelled the first time. It wasn't because the stories got repetitive. They each had their own feel to them, and the different sections of the book definitely added new puzzle pieces to the story each time. But I think that it's because I'm not a history buff, nor am I very knowledgeable about 20th century political conflicts, especially when it comes to regions that I was just never taught about sufficiently in school (read: The Middle East, China, and South America). So, when it came to parts where history mattered to a particular person's story, I just kind of felt... dumb? This isn't saying that this book should take a hit for my inability to know important parts of history, but it is a reason why I think this book might be a slow read for some people, or why it is not compelling during parts. I do have a lot of good things to say about this book. Although none of the characters really caught my attention on that deep level (I didn't take away feelings of deep sorrow or happiness from any one character's problems or victories), the stories weaved through each other in ways that I think is hard to do. Especially when you consider the fact that, in the world of this novel, none of the characters really interacted, save a couple. That's pretty amazing to me. I was convinced, while reading the stories, of the gravity and utterly horrifying situation that the book is set in. World War Z is a must-read, especially for history lovers and zombie nerds.