Bài Tập Tiếng Anh 10 - Có Đáp Án (Ấn Bản 2017) tải xuống LIT miễn phí

Zef Fugaz zef — Debut story across different scopes of time tying together in a story of self discovery and exploration. The writer tries a different style of writing the command of english language used in this story is good. Was all round not bad story.

Marko Lenz marko_lenz9078 — Great characters.

Vitor Meireles _orrestbiind — From the very first sentence I was in thrall. Ann Patchett is a lyrical writer. I felt rocked and lulled by this story - there is just something about her writing that is soothing and calming. And the book is about being taken hostage!

Yessie Setiawan deyelicious — Johnny is an alien from the planet Lorien who had to take refuge with his guardian on Earth after his planet was destroyed. He has moved around and has had so many different identities that it's hard for him to keep track. But he has to stay ahead of those that wish to hunt him down and kill him. There were 8 other children who escaped also escaped and live all throughout the world. They are protected by a charm so that they can only be killed in order of the numbers they were given. Numbers 1-3 have been killed and Johnny is number 4. This book was pretty good. It was really slow in the beginning and I wish that the action would have been all throughout the book instead of in the last 40 pages of the book. It is an interesting concept, but it just wasn't as action packed as I would have liked and the "big" war at the end wasn't as big as I thought it could have been. It still was a good read and it did have me hooked, but I felt a bit let down. The author was very good about keeping the suspense going and really draws you in. I am excited to see how the story will unravel in future books if the author decides to do them. Content Warning: Language

Andrew Guisgand andysignart — Really more of a two-and-a-half star book. Ostensibly, the purpose of this book is to present and explain the beliefs contained in the Westminster Shorter Catechism. However, Williamson choose a much more partisan path, and uses the book to present his own particular variety of Presbyterianism and his own interpretation of the Catechism, not the text of the Catechism itself. So, for example, according to Williamson, it is not wrong to drink alcohol (believer's freedom), but it is wrong to sing any uninspired songs (i.e., songs that are not psalms) as part of Christian worship (regulative principle), even though the Westminster Catechism does not actually take a position on either issue. He also tends to focus on his particular pet issues--such as the need for Christian schools as opposed to secular public education--which, regardless of whether the reader agrees with him, are not necessary in a discussion of the Westminster Catechism. Williamson is also prone to hyperbole--to such an extent that it damages his credibility with the reader. So, according to Williamson, no doctrine is more clearly taught in the bible than election (I grant that it is clearly taught, but there are many doctrines more clearly taught), and he repeatedly uses words like "obviously" or "clearly" and is generally overly dismissive of opposing viewpoints. As a result, he renders his own opinions more suspect in the mind of a careful reader. (In his defense of infant baptism against those who advocate believer's baptism, he borders on snide.) He also devotes a lot of attention (and an entire Appendix) to the model of prophet-priest-king, not only as illustrated in Christ, but as illustrated in pre-fallen man, corrupted in fallen man, and rectified in salvation. This may be a central teaching of Presbyterianism; I don't know. It was the first time I'd seen such a thing, and it was not immediately apparent to me from the text of the Catechism. The book does include helpful discussions of many challenging biblical principles. The illustrations, though simplistic, are useful and largely well done. Williamson seems to be at his best when explaining the gospel and more abstract theology concepts--the Trinity, the dual nature of Christ, the representative principle (in Adam all sin), etc. When he got into the weeds of practical application, he tended to come across as rigid and puritanical, often without sufficient textual support for his views. Still it would make a good family devotional, if you read with a critical and discerning eye so you can distinguish between what the bible necessarily teaches and what is just Williamson's (or the Westminster Catechism's) interpretation.

Adam Adam adamgajdzik034a — Very sad to think this could really happen to a child and he lived to tell about it. I would give it 5 stars but it is depressing to read!