Tập Viết Chữ Hoa Lớp 1 (Tái Bản) tải xuống LIT miễn phí

Ian Hsu ian0c09 — This is good classic scifi from a writer who should be much better known than he is, which, although a bit dated, has some uncanny insights to offer. Set in a world where the body and mind are commodity it takes a scathing look at the materialistic, faceless corporate mentality through cyberpunk mirrorshades. Except of course it was written way before the term 'cyberpunk' was even coined. Definitely worth a read.

Lauri Boris bokar546401 — My 9th grade English teacher was not able to convince me that this is a great book and I haven't changed my mind. Read this if you love old men and or the sea. I thought it was boooooooooooooring.

Sophie Blake sophied76c — The sequel to The King Must Die, this book picks up almost exactly where the last book ends. It covers the rest of the legend of Theseus, combining the original legend with Renault's blend of imagination and historical research. This is probably the weakest of Renault's books that I've read. The pacing of the book - cramming most of the life of one of Greece's most famous legendary heroes into less than 250 pages - means that Renault was always going to need a strong and clearly defined character in order to carry the book without it feeling rushed and uneven. Theseus never comes across to me as any of those things. In fact, he never even comes across to me as remotely likeable. There was a coldness and a remoteness to the character that I can't recall encountering when reading her Alexander trilogy, for instance. It's as if Renault was trying to create a real man from an archetypal hero, and got stalled halfway through the process. Overall, she handled the conversion from myth to novel well, providing some plausible and fairly realistic expectations for parts of the legendary cycle. The rest of the historical aspect shall be passed over in silence by me, mostly because I can appreciate that at the time Renault was writing, much of what she was saying was still accepted as historical fact. (But it's not, it's really, really not! 'Shore People'! Matriarchal religion being replaced by the patriarchy! Mycenaeans in 1500BCE!) I was more than a little irked by her representation of some aspects of gender history/interaction. I can buy that, since this novel was from Theseus' viewpoint, - and he was a pretty typical example of a Bronze Age male raised in a patriarchal society - that he would have no problem in ascribing a woman's anger to the fact that it was her 'moon time.' I had much, much greater problems with the representation of Hippolyta; not that Theseus would think of her as he did, but that a woman who was supposedly raised as an independent and self-sufficient Amazon would have thought and acted as she did, and would have what seemed to me to be a high level of internalised misogyny. It made me very, very uneasy reading those sections. I think I'll be re-reading the Alexander trilogy long before I pick this one up again. It's not a bad novel; it just didn't really do so much for me.

Tano Alpuche _anoalpuche — Churchill sucessfully dismantles liberal moralistic insistence on non-violence, even if he does romanticize 9/11 just a tiny bit. required listening for AFSC and their ilk.

Mert çetin mertcetin — This is a fascinating and easy read. Anyone interested in the political/religious dichotomy in Turkey will like this book.

James P jamespatrick — The movie was better- I know, I hate me for saying it too but its true. The book taught me the actual definition of the f-bomb and although it had its moments I didn't enjoy it at all. Hoffman captured a more twisted magic, not honest like real magic.

Vesna Veljkovic florence130530 — This was a fascinating book that I couldn't put down. Parts of the 2nd half I thought were underdeveloped.