Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều Tác Giả
This was very interesting, I read it a while ago so I can't remember much but I do remember being disappointed at its length - of course, I think that of every Jane Austen book; although this one was uncommonly short.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Liz Kessler
http://lecturadirecta.blogspot.com.es...
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Cù Thanh Toàn
Oh my... you haven't read this book? You poor dear. I suspect that the reason why this book is not read in the United States is because the grey men are working very hard to keep it off the shelves. It is moments, not time, that is precious.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi:
This book is a satirical look at journalism, specifically war journalism, in 1930s Britain. The commonplace racism of the time is quite evident in Waugh's treatment of the people of Ishmaelia (in NE Africa) but the book is very much a product of its time. It was a good satire and I'm sure must have been hilarious when relevant. As I'm neither British, nor immersed in 1930s pop-culture, I was amused but not delighted by the book. The best recommendation I have is - a quick read with some funny parts.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nhiều tác giả
I enjoyed the skillful incorporation of the Xmen/Marvel universe into traditional folktale/fairy tale lore.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hector Malot
'Portrait' becomes Joyce's reputation as one of the greatest authors of all time. The internal structure of the language is reason enough to read it: as a basic introduction to Joyce it is the best book to start with, as someone who wants to read 'Ulysses', it's a must. For all the rest, it's a must read anyway.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Brock Clarke
Some people list this book as children's / teen fiction. Maybe teens, but I would like to think that I would not be horrible enough of a parent to read these to a child. They are macabre and disturbing. That being said, they are FABULOUS! Fabulously written, fabulously plotted, and just generally fabulously conceived. My favorite is "Hermit Wanted". "The Button Thief" is also great and possibly also the only one that would be appropriate for children.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Nguyễn Hoàng Mai
I actually picked up a signed copy at a local shop when Gaiman and I were both living in Minnesota. I've read a lot of Gaiman, and while appreciate that he is always a conscious, active writer, his stories sometimes fall flat for me. They always work on the principle of a small person trapped in a large, unknown world. There are plenty of great examples of this story type, and Gaiman has been steadily working through them. He took inspiration from Fairy Tales in Stardust, from European myth in American Gods, and African myth in Anansi Boys. Though Morpheus was no small man, the individual story arcs dealt with normal folks. Sandman and Good Omens worked off of Christian mythos, while Neverwhere created myths from modern symbols. If Neverwhere is a rewrite of Alice in Wonderland, Coraline is in some ways an even closer take on Carroll, except that here, Gaiman is exploring a more overtly frightening world, evoking Gothic ghost stories. Unlike his other stories, Gaiman has less to draw on here. He is not bringing in specific myths, but rather creating his own symbols. Since he is not bringing in the many and varied elements that mark most of his tales, Coraline sets a much barer stage. When he does bring in mythological elements, he always put his own spin on them, so he cannot be faulted for a lack of creative force. Indeed, he is at his most engaging when he is exploring and subverting various world mythologies, of which he is well-versed. Even in the less mythologized Neverwhere, he drew on the visual imagery and history of London itself, a great city which traces its roots from before Rome, and is not without its own legends. By eschewing any particular tradition in Coraline, Gaiman has little to play with. He has nothing to subvert, nothing to vaguely reference. He cannot play upon our expectations. All this tracks back to the reason that Gaiman explores these mythologies in the first place: his interest in writing about storytelling itself. Each time he writes, he places himself in a tradition, recognizing how the ancients used myth and symbol to create stories that instruct, inspire, and surprise. Coraline does not explore its own origins. It does not display the genre savvy play of Gaiman's other work. It is not an exploration of the ghost story, nor of 'Through the Looking-Glass'. It is not a deconstruction of the Gothic. It is a simple little tale, and not without its charm. I found little frightening about it, simply because there was little that was either unexpected or psychologically gripping. The most interesting element was the way he played with how we learn about identity. There is a point in childhood when we suspect that there us something that makes up identity beyond simply the appearance or form. The idea that a parent or friend could be replaced by a doppelganger is inherently terrifying. However, Gaiman does not produce a new twist on doppelgangers or changelings. Neither did the portrayal utilize surprise or subtlety to develop an unsettling mood. Rather, he presented overtly frightening or alien elements, bolstered by the characters' reactions. But it's not frightening to simply show scary things. Hearing a strange noise in the woods is not the same as being told that a character hears a strange noise in the woods. It only becomes frightening when the vividness of the description or the realism of the character's psychology allows us to tap into that sense of fear. This little story could have made a passable entry in a horror story collection, but is not original enough to stand on its own. I found this rather odd, since Gaiman is entirely capable of creating frightening stories, as evidenced by the fairy tale rewrite 'Snow, Glass, Apples' (from 'Smoke and Mirrors'). He has been frightening, disturbing, and unusual elsewhere, but here, I found little to speak of his creative flair.
Holy moley this book rocks my world. It shows exactly how to stretch those crazy random muscles that... you want to stretch... 'cuz they're bothering you... 'cuz you did something weird that hurted them.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Vũ Lập Nhật
I love Twilight and I always will. I get that people don't think it's the best writing, and that Bella is dependant and stupid, but honestly? I have never been more hooked into a story until I read it. It pulls you in. :) I love the characters, although I wish Jacob was included more in the book. It may not be the "best", but it was good enough to be made into a movie series and be very successful. I enjoyed it. :) Content: PG - Kissing, language (mild), violence (moderate)
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.