Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Lập Thệ Thành Yêu
a little reationary...a little victimizing...didn't like it all that much...did bring up a few good discussion points...
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Louie Stowell
I love this collection of short stories from the brilliant mind of Kurt Vonnegut.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Thi Nại Am
Blood Vice wasn't bad. It goes into pretty good detail about mob politics. This was a pretty refreshing change with your standard vampire urban fiction. Sadly, I found the male vampire lead to be a bit too emotionless and stale. Also, the strongest part about the book, the mob politics and issues between families, dies out about halfway through and it turns into the standard vampire conflict, with all mob issues taking a back seat. Kind of a mix between an urban fantasy and a romance, this book isn't bad. It's a decent read, and while I enjoyed it, it won't be one I pick up to reread another day.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hồng Lam
ISG is one cool chic. The stories in here are fantastic, if you have ever visited the Museum or know anything about her, this would be a good read. It definitely is a biography though, so it took me awhile to get through--lots of facts.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Hisako Madokoro
I couldn't put this book down! I finished it in three days! The characters just become people you root for and care about! I can't wait to read the next 2.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Người Khăn Trắng
Have you ever heard the subject architectural theory spoken in combination with terms such as 'best selling' and 'popular'? Before I start, I would like to tell you how difficult it was to access this book through my university library. At first I thought, well, that's the anthology of Danish firm BIG that everyone from overenthusiastic first years to I am holier than thou professors have been raving about, surely the library must have dozens of copies! But no, even though The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex alone has 5 copies just in ONE library division, Yes is More had to wait half a year before someone poor enough in my faculty to demand a copy. Then, three months later, it was promptly 'stolen' after two days on the selves. Also by someone who had the talent of tracking it down before it was catergorised and stacked between other requests such as Twilight and which ever Ian McEwan's new book happened to be. After agonising whether I should just sell out and pay $32, it finally came into my hand as the person on the wait list before me graduated before the book was recovered. The hype has died down by the time I could read it without everyone telling me how mind blowing and life changing it was. I wonder if BIG would get a movie deal. Anyway, I was quite surprised by the quality of this mixture of graphic narration and contemporary architectural practice. It's straightforward, compelling, and more relevant than most other contemporary architectural practice/theory books out there. So, if I am to sell this book like I would a project proposal, this is what it would look like: Pro: 1. Starting from the basics - Ingels explains the origin of his projects and the conception of idea, modification and research along the way. It's down to Earth and approachable for both theorist and practitioner. 2. Personal - Ingels is always there in EACH and EVERY frame. You really get to know the guy and his crappy hair cut. 3. Geography - you learn a lot about Denmark. 4. Models - even though these people pride themselves on being green, a copious amount of foam models are produced. They even have a little model making room. I've never worked in an office that cares so much about model making since model making facilities and material = $$$$$$ 5. Effective diagrams - BIG's methodology is clearly communicated and can easily be adopted if you're struggling to come up with your own Con: 1. Format - Yes is More is told like a comic and it gets to you after a while. I'm not sure if they gave the intern the job of writing the speech bubbles, but they are boring as hell for someone who's trying to make the graphic 'innovative' and interesting. 2. Anthology - I'm not saying it isn't good to include such a large sample of proposals, but it is understandable why and how some of them are shot down due to budget constraint and excessive time consumption 3. Photography - some pictures are pixelated after obvious photoshopping - dude you guys are in architecture! WTF 4. Ego - this guy is narcissistic, but then he's an architect, so I guess it's justifiable for him to go all Look at me!! Look at my SHINNY ORGANIC FORMS!! AND MY ORANGE SUIT!! 5. Koolhaas whoring - Ingels worked with de Smeldt from OMA, and it's pretty obvious if you compare their works. 6. Social integration and ecology are two concerns often mentioned, while BIG has an interesting attitude towards the latter (evolutionary vernacular architecture), the former seems superficial and the results iconographic in representation. 7. Architecture - with the exception of the first few designs, BIG's originality diminishes more and more until you have OMA deja vu. Yes is More is a lot like what BIG promotes - a contemporary attitude of problem solving as opposed to revolutionary newness. The presentation, while isn't the best, is nonetheless effective and thought provoking. It's interesting to see such a large integration of architectural theory and practice that isn't purely theoretical (*cough* Arakwara and Gins *cough*), so yeah, I'd recommend it. Probably my favourite project. CYCLING ON ROOF WEEEEEEEE
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Lưu Sướng
Tucker, who was a dynamic presenter at our Orlando Book Festival this year, chronicles the early history of blood transfusion and all the scandals, conflicts, and mysteries that surrounded it. Set in seventeenth-century Paris and London and following the physicians, both pro and con, Blood Work provides a great picture of a time when science was wrapped up in superstition. Very interesting book.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Dương Minh Tuấn
Amazing book - Amazing story. To say I cried is an understatement. It's very sad but very touching.
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Dan Ariely
SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Roald Dahl
much too predictable; and spelling and grammar mistakes!
Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.