Akbayan Bakitzhanova từ Nurići, Bosnia and Herzegovina

akbayanbak5dc9

05/05/2024

Dữ liệu người dùng, đánh giá và đề xuất cho sách

Akbayan Bakitzhanova Sách lại (10)

2019-07-23 10:31

Bình Yên Tạm Bợ Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi:

What I really wish is that Anna Karenina were published in 2 or 3 volumes, because that would make it physically easier to handle and carry around, and I could more conveniently reread it again and again. Re-reading, and this time I'm going to capture some of my favorite lines... "[Stepan Arkadyich, or Stiva:] had never thought the question over clearly, but vaguely imagined that his wife had long suspected him of being unfaithful to her and was looking the other way. It even seemed to him that she, a worn-out, aged, no longer beautiful woman, not remarkable for anything, simple, merely a kind mother of a family, ought in all fairness to be indulgent. It turned out to be quite the opposite." (I, 2) Stiva is professionally successful for several reasons, my favorite is: "third - most important - a perfect indifference to the business he was occupied with, owing to which he never got carried away and never made mistakes." (I, 5) Stiva takes Levin, his friend from the country, to dine at a Moscow restaurant. He's planned an elaborate Anglo-French menu, but then the waiter tells him they have oysters. "In that case, shouldn't we begin with oysters, and then change the whole plan? Eh?" [Levin:] "It makes no difference to me. I like shchi and kasha best, but they won't have that here." The waiter suggests *Kasha a la Russe*, but Levin declines. (I, 10) "Between Countess Nordston and Levin there had been established those relations, not infrequent in society, in which two persons, while ostensibly remaining on friendly terms, are contemptuous of each other to such a degree that they cannot even treat each other seriously and cannot even insult one another." (I, 14) "[Vronsky:] did not know that his behavior toward Kitty had a specific name, that it was the luring of a young lady without the intention of marriage, and that this luring was one of the bad actions common among brilliant young men such as himself. It seemed to him that he was the first to discover this pleasure, and he enjoyed his discovery." (I, 16).

2019-07-23 12:31

Bách Khoa Thư Kỳ Diệu Cho Trẻ Em - Giải Phẩu Cơ Thể Người Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn

Sách được viết bởi Bởi: Rahul Singhal & Xact Team

Okay, so upon completing The Giver trilogy, I was a little upset. Within the first few chapters all three books were tied together. I have three questions after reading it: (The following questions contain spoilers) 1) How were the changes occurring? - While it was clear that the Trade Mart was the root of the evil, it was never clear how that all operated. The Mentor traded his deepest inner self, but were the others trading the same? Whatever it was, their trading for comfort, ease and entitlement was someow connected to the forest. Somehow they were connected, which brings me to my next question 2) What explains Forest's demeanor/personality? - The forest warned them from entering/kept people from leaving. Somehow it was the gatekeeper to the Village. It seems to me that it at first protected others from the communities from which they fled, then in the end protected others from the changing community's new negative attitude towards outsiders. This in comparison to the total control over the earth and its resources demonstrated in The Giver, where increased technology and knowledge can conquer the elements meant to protect us, in order to establish stability and efficiency, yet requires the sacrifice of personal autonomy and pleasure--freedom and joy. Speaking of sacrifice, 3) How did Matty heal the Mentor and others like him in the Village? - I understand that he can heal physical and even emotional or mental illnesses and injuries. I don't, however, understand how he was able to change the inner self of people who had chosen to trade it away. Especially when it had already been said that what is traded can never be taken back. That doesn't make sense to me. That Matty dies in the end troubles me, but I understand that it is symbolic of the necessity of sacrifice to allow for the compensation of wrong acts. Sadly, nothingof the atonement of Matty points to permanent change. In but a generation people will forget, just as they had forgotten the roots of their village's founding.

Người đọc Akbayan Bakitzhanova từ Nurići, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Người dùng coi những cuốn sách này là thú vị nhất trong năm 2017-2018, ban biên tập của cổng thông tin "Thư viện Sách hướng dẫn" khuyến cáo rằng tất cả các độc giả sẽ làm quen với văn học này.